Miami-Dade FL Appeals, Insurance and Intellectual property L -- eLawyers

Leonardo G Renaud

Visitors: 48

(305

) 390-0408

Bar #958603(FL) License for 33 years; Member in Good Standing

Miami Lakes FL

Are you Leonardo G Renaud? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

06-004481 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs EDEN ISLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 08, 2006

The issue in this case is whether Respondent condominium association properly assessed unit owners for common expenses based on their respective proportionate shares of such expenses as set forth in the declaration of condominium.Petitioner does not have jurisdiction to determine whether Respondent properly assessed unit owners for common expenses based on their proportionate shares as established in the condo declaration because there is controversy over its meaning.

06-004482 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs EDEN ISLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 08, 2006

The issue in this case is whether Respondent condominium association timely mailed or hand delivered to unit owners either a copy of the annual financial report for the year 2004 or, alternatively, a notice stating that a copy of the report would be provided to any owner, free of charge, upon request.Sanctions should be imposed against Respondent, for failing timely to mail or hand deliver to unit owners either a copy of the annual financial report for 2004 or, alternatively, a notice stating that a copy would be provided free of charge, upon request.

06-004483 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs EDEN ISLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 08, 2006

The issue in this case is whether Respondent condominium association misused "reserve funds."Respondent did not have (and was not required to have) a statutory reserve account because, for each annual budget at issue, a majority of the unit owners had voted to waive the funding of reserves. Respondent did not improperly misuse "reserve funds."

Leonardo G Renaud

06-004481 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs EDEN ISLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. (2006)

06-004482 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs EDEN ISLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. (2006)

06-004483 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs EDEN ISLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. (2006)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.