Broward FL and Privacy Lawyers | Luna Ergas Phillips -- eLawyers

4D06-2394 Silverstein v. State (2006)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2006 Citations: 937 So. 2d 137

937 So. 2d 137 (2006) SILVERSTEIN v. STATE. No. 4D06-2394. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 16, 2006. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

14-004860F WILLIAM GUERRERO AND CHRISTINA BANG, A/K/A CHRISTINA GUERRERO vs BERNARD SPINRAD AND MARIEN SPINRAD (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2014

The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners, William Guererro and Christina Bang, a/k/a Christina Guerrero, are entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, from Respondents, Bernard Spinrad and Marien Spinrad, related to litigation between the parties in DOAH Case No. 13- 2254.Petitioners failed to demonstrate that they were entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes.

13-002254 BERNARD SPINRAD AND MARION SPINRAD vs WILLIAM GUERRERO, CHRISTINA BANG, A/K/A CHRISTINA GUERRERO, AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 2013

The issue to be determined is whether the applicants, William Guererro and Christina Bang, a/k/a Christina Guerrero (Applicants), are entitled to issuance of a Consolidated Environmental Resource Permit and State Lands Approvals for various structures on the Applicants’ property at 58458 Overseas Highway, Marathon, Florida.The Applicants demonstrated that they were entitled to the exemptions and general permit for structures and activiites on their property, and to the soverign submerged lands authorizations related thereto.

12-002811 FLORIDA AUDUBON SOCIETY vs SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA, UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, SUGAR FARMS CO-OP, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 17, 2012

The issue to be determined in this case is whether Respondents, United States Sugar Corporation (“USSC”), Sugar Farms Co-op (“SFC”), and Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida (“SCGC”) (collectively “the Applicants”) are entitled to the Everglades Works of the District permits (“WOD Permits”), issued to them by the South Florida Water Management District (“District”).Petitioner failed to prove that the Applicants are not entitled to the Works of the District permits in the Everglades Agricultural Area.

11-006137RP FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.; SIERRA CLUB, INC.; CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC.; ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC.; AND ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 01, 2011

The issues to be determined in these consolidated cases are whether existing Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-302.530(47)(b) of the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department"), referred to as the "narrative nutrient rule," is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, and whether certain proposed rules of the Department, which amend Florida Administrative Code Chapters 62-302, entitled “Surface Water Quality Standards” and 62-303, entitled “Identification of Impaired Surface Waters,” are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.Petitioners failed to prove the DEP's narrative nutrient rule was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. DEP proved the proposed changes to chapters 62-302 & 62-303 were not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.

12-000157RP FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.; SIERRA CLUB, INC.; CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC.; ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC.; AND ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2012

Petitioners failed to prove the DEP's narrative nutrient rule was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. DEP proved the proposed changes to chapters 62-302 & 62-303 were not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.

08-003823 PROTECT KEY WEST AND THE FLORIDA KEYS, INC., D/B/A LAST STAND vs MONROE COUNTY AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2008

The issue is whether to approve an application by Respondent, Monroe County (County), to modify its Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 44-00149-S (Permit) to authorize the construction and operation of Runway Safety Area (RSA) improvements for the existing 9/27 runway and associated wetland mitigation work at Key West International Airport (Airport).Monroe County gave reasonable assurances that no adverse impacts would occur by virtue of making safety improvements at Key West Airport; modification of ERP approved.

06-004922 CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA vs G.L. HOMES OF NAPLES ASSOCIATES II, LTD., AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 05, 2006

The issue in this case is whether the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD, or District) should issue a Modification to Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 11- 02055-P, Application No. 060713-9, to G.L. Homes of Naples Associates II, Ltd. (G.L. Homes, or Applicant), which authorizes modifications to the surface water management system (SWMS) for a residential development known as Saturnia Falls (the Project).Recommend denial of modification to the Environmental Resource Permit because offsite mitigation no longer fully offsets wetland impacts.

03-002872RP MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION COMMISSION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 2003

Whether Proposed Rule 62-302.540, as formally noticed for adoption by the Department of Environmental Protection on July 18, 2003, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?Respondent`s proposed rule, "water quality standards for phosphorus within the Everglades Protection Area," is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

03-002873RP FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION COMMISSION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 2003

Whether Proposed Rule 62-302.540, as formally noticed for adoption by the Department of Environmental Protection on July 18, 2003, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?Respondent`s proposed rule, "water quality standards for phosphorus within the Everglades Protection area," is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Luna Ergas Phillips