Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 1983
This case involves the issue of whether Petitioner's application for licensure as a psychologist was properly denied. At the formal hearing the Petitioner testified on his own behalf and called as additional witnesses Dr. F. Donald Kelly, Jr., and Dr. Jane Raker. Respondent called as its only witness Dr. Aubrey Perry. Petitioner offered and had admitted into evidence six exhibits and Respondent offered and had admitted into evidence three exhibits. The Department of Professional Regulation file regarding the Petitioner was offered and admitted as a joint exhibit. Counsel for the Petitioner and counsel for the Respondent submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for consideration by the Hearing Officer. To the extent that those proposed findings are consistent with the findings herein, they were adopted. To the extent that such proposed findings are inconsistent with the findings contained in this order, they were considered by the Hearing Officer and rejected as not being supported by the evidence or as being unnecessary to the resolution of this cause.Attorney did not receive final order. Can appellate jurisdictional time periods be extended by state action depriving party notice of appealable order?
