Entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include paranoid schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and chronic depression.The appellant's statements about symptoms beginning in June 1987 do not establish in-service onset.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-7058 PEDRO P. DEL ROSARIO, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. Mark R. Lippman, The Veteran Law Group, of La Jolla, California, argued for claimant- appellant. Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With..
Opinions of the United 1998 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-3-1998 United States v. Leggett Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 96-7772 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998 Recommended Citation "United States v. Leggett" (1998). 1998 Decisions. Paper 274. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998/274 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States..
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ CERISE CHECO, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. _ 2013-7059 _ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 11-3683. _ Decided: April 23, 2014 _ MARK R. LIPPMAN, The Veterans Law Group, of La Jolla, California, argued for claimant-appellant. TARA K. HOGAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depart- ment of Ju..
162 F.3d 237 UNITED STATES of America v. Michael K. LEGGETT, Appellant. No. 96-7772. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued May 18, 1998. Decided Dec. 3, 1998. David M. Barasch, United States Attorney, Middle District of Pennsylvania, Frederick E. Martin (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Williamsport, PA, for Appellee. Mark R. Lippman (argued), La Jolla, CA, for Appellant. Before: ROTH and McKEE, Circuit Judges, and O'NEILL, 1 District Judge. OPINION OF THE COURT ROTH, Ci..
201 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER JAMES ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CARLOS ANTHONY MIRANDA, a.k.a. Pico, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-50238, 98-50239 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Argued and Submitted August 2, 1999 Filed January 25, 2000 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] COUNSEL: Kenneth M. Miller, Santa Ana, California, for defendant-appellant Anderson. Mark R. Lippman, La Joll..
98 F.3d 105 UNITED STATES of America v. Zulmes OROZCO, Appellant. No. 95-1572. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Oct. 18, 1996. Wendy A. Kelly, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee. Mark R. Lippman, La Jolla, CA, for Appellant. Before: GREENBERG and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges and LAY, Senior Circuit Judge. * OPINION OF THE COURT NYGAARD, Circuit Judge: 1 Defendant-appellant, Zulmes Orozco challenges the constitutionality of the Dr..
94 F.3d 1312 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6616 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,815 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Tamayo BARON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10369. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 12, 1996. * Decided Sept. 4, 1996. Mark R. Lippman, La Jolla, California, for defendant-appellant. Joan G. Ruffennach, Assistant United States Attorney, Phoenix, Arizona, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of A..
82 F.3d 921 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3156 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5204 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Susan Sukming CHAN, a/k/a Ching Wei Chang, a/k/a Jane Doe, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50585. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 9, 1996. * Decided May 6, 1996. Mark R. Lippman, La Jolla, California, for defendant-appellant. John C. Rayburn, Assistant United States Attorney, Santa Ana, California, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States..
46 F.3d 885 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard SANTIAGO, a/k/a "Chuco", Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50375. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1994. Decided Jan. 24, 1995. Mark R. Lippman, La Jolla, CA, for defendant-appellant. David C. Scheper, Asst. U.S. Atty., and David F. Taylor, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: D...
