welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Martin R Press
Martin R Press
Martin R Press
Visitors: 43
0
Bar #164524(FL)     License for 52 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Martin R Press? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

No. 16141-04  ABOUELNOOR v. COMMISSIONER  (2005)
United States Tax Court Filed: Dec. 05, 2005
T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-178 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SANDRA R. MURRAY AND KHALED M. ABOUELNOOR, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 16141-04S. Filed December 5, 2005. Sandra R. Murray and Khaled M. Abouelnoor, pro sese. Hieu C. Nguyen, for respondent. ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 The decision to be entered 1 Unless otherwise indicat..
No. 2370-06S  Mallin v. Comm'r  (2008)
United States Tax Court Filed: Feb. 11, 2008
T.C. Summary Opinion 2008-13 UNITED STATES TAX COURT BRIAN E. & MARCIE L. MALLIN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 2370-06S. Filed February 11, 2008. Brian E. Mallin and Marcie L. Mallin, pro sese. Tamara L. Kotzker, for respondent. ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewa..
No. 18446-05S  Clarke-Lewis v. Comm'r  (2008)
United States Tax Court Filed: Feb. 11, 2008
T.C. Summary Opinion 2008-14 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CIMBERLY CATHERINE CLARKE–LEWIS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 18446-05S. Filed February 11, 2008. Cimberly Catherine Clarke–Lewis, pro se. Chong S. Hong, for respondent. DEAN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed. Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by an..
182  Territory of New Mexico v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company  (1906)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 12, 1906 Citations: 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1814, 201 U.S. 41, 26 S. Ct. 386, 50 L. Ed. 651
201 U.S. 41 26 S. Ct. 386 50 L. Ed. 651 TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO, Appt. , v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA, & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Rio Grande, Mexico, & Pacific Railroad Company, and Silver City, Deming, & Pacific Railroad Company. No. 182. Argued January 26, 1906. Decided March 12, 1906. Messrs. Frank W. Clancy and A. H. Harllee for appellant. Messrs. Robert Dunlap, H. L. Waldo, R. E. Twitchell , and Gardiner Lathrop for appellees. Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court: 1 The territ..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer