Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Michael David Milnes
Michael David Milnes
Visitors: 22
0
Bar #857491(FL)     License for 20 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Michael David Milnes? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569120.57173.08253.39287.001287.012287.057697.07

11-005794BID  PRO TECH MONITORING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 10, 2011
The issue in this case is whether Respondent's intended award of a contract to Intervenor pursuant to Request for Proposals No. 10-DC-8200 is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, Respondent's rules and policies, and the specifications of the Request for Proposals.Petitioner proved that Intervenor's proposal contained material deviations from the terms, conditions and specifications of the RFP. The award of the contract to Intervenor was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to competition.
09-004679PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MATTHEW J. KACHINAS, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002), in DOAH Case No. 09-4678PL; Subsections 456.072(1)(l), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), in DOAH Case No. 09-4679PL; and Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), in DOAH Case No. 09-4680PL, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent committed gross malpractice when he failed to identify the twin with anomalies in a selected feticide and performed the procedure on the normal twin.
07-000659PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs STEPHEN W. THOMPSON, M.D.  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 08, 2007
The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003),1 and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent did not fall below the standard of care when he left the operating room to deliver a baby and then return to complete the procedures. He was at a facility 2 minutes away, and meanwhile, unsterile instruments had to be sterilized.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer