Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Michael Mattimore
Michael Mattimore
Visitors: 74
0
Bar #335071(FL)     License for 44 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Michael Mattimore? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

3D00-2082  KEA v. State  (2001)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 05, 2001 Citations: 802 So. 2d 410
802 So. 2d 410 (2001) K.E.A., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D00-2082. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 5, 2001. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE and GERSTEN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge. NESBITT, Senior Judge. K.E.A. challenges his adjudication of delinquenc..
3D05-680, 3D05-709  Medina v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 01, 2008 Citations: 995 So. 2d 975
995 So. 2d 975 (2008) MEDINA v. STATE. No. 3D05-680, 3D05-709. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. October 1, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
80-375  STATE, ETC. v. Contemporary Land Sales, Inc.  (1981)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 20, 1981 Citations: 400 So. 2d 488
400 So. 2d 488 (1981) STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Appellant, v. CONTEMPORARY LAND SALES, INC., Appellee. No. 80-375. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. May 20, 1981. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1981. *490 Jack W. Pierce, and S. Sherman Weiss, Tallahassee, for appellant. John F. Bennett, of Fishback, Davis, Dominick & Bennett, Orlando, for appellee. COWART, Judge. This case involves the application of the Marketable Record Title Act (§ 712.01 et seq., Fla. Sta..
15-002019RU  PHILIP CARTER vs FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
The issue in this case is whether a statement of Respondent's, which informed Petitioner of his right to seek judicial review of an administrative decision Respondent deemed outside the purview of the Administrative Procedure Act, constitutes an agency statement of general applicability that implements, interprets, or prescribes law or policy in violation of section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes.Respondent's statement, which informed Petitioner of his right to seek judicial review of an administrative decision, is not an unadopted rule, for one, because Respondent is not an agency when exercising authority derived from the constitution.
11-000740RU  CYNTHIA ORNDOFF vs FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 14, 2011
Whether the Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction to hear a petition, brought pursuant to section 120.56(4), Florida Statutes (2010),1/ claiming that a state university's documents concerning the process and criteria for faculty performance evaluation; documents from the university's College of Business setting out a Framework and Standards for Contract Renewal and Promotion for faculty; and documents showing the university's organization structure and delegations of authority are "agency statements" that require rule-making under the Administrative Procedure Act.University's documents concerning faculty evaluation, retention, and organizational structure derived from exercise of article IX, section 7, Florida Constitution; thus, no subject matter jurisdiction for the Administrative Procedures Act.
07-002655  CAROL TUCKER vs CHIPOLA COLLEGE  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 2007
The issue in this case is whether Petitioner has been subjected to an unlawful employment practice.Petitioner failed to establish a disability; thus, she failed to establish discrimination based on a handicap.
05-003365SED  JANET MITCHELL vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 16, 2005
The issue in the case is whether Petitioner’s employment position was properly reclassified from career service to the selected exempt service pursuant to Section 110.205(2)(x), Florida Statutes (2001). All citations are to Florida Statutes (2001) unless otherwise stated.Respondent properly reclassified Petitioner`s position from career service to selected exempt service.
04-002339F  MAVIS R. GEORGALIS vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 06, 2004
What amount of legal fees and costs should be awarded to Petitioner pursuant to Section 120.569(2)(e) or 57.105(5), Florida Statutes, for Respondent’s erroneous classification of Petitioner’s position and subsequent failure to correct that error and reclassify Petitioner’s position back to career service as requested by her in Georgalis v. F.D.O.T., DOAH Case No. 03-4665SED.Counsel for Petitioner is entitled to fees and costs, which are awarded pursuant to Sections 57.105 and 120.569, Florida Statutes.
05-000094  JAMES M. BOWLES vs JACKSON COUNTY HOSPITAL CORPORATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Petitioner was subjected to an unlawful employment practice by Respondent due to Petitioner's race, age, or sex in violation of Section 760.10, Florida Statutes.Petitioner is unable to show animus by Respondent for termination of employment on the basis of age, race, or gender. Recommend that the Petition for Relief be denied.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer