welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Michael Patrick Donaldson
Michael Patrick Donaldson
Michael Patrick Donaldson
Visitors: 146
0
Bar #802761(FL)     License for 36 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Michael Patrick Donaldson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-003304BID  PINNACLE HEIGHTS, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 09, 2015
The issue is whether Florida Housing and Finance Corporation's intended decision to award low income housing tax credits for an affordable housing development in Miami-Dade County to Rio at Flagler, LP (Rio), was contrary to solicitation specifications, and if so, whether that determination was clearly erroneous or contrary to competition.Petitioner established that Intervenor's application was incorrectly scored by agency; tax credits for affordable housing awarded to Petitioner rather than Intervenor.
15-002394BID  CLEARLAKE VILLAGE, L.P. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 28, 2015
Whether Respondent Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s intended decision to find the application of Clearlake Village, L.P., ineligible for funding is contrary to Respondent’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of showing that Florida Housing's decision to find its application ineligible for funding was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, contrary to statutes, rules or specifications, or contrary to competition.
15-002386BID  CAPITAL GROVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 28, 2015
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing, Corporation, or Respondent) rejection of the funding for the application submitted by Capital Grove Limited Partnership (Capital Grove) was contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the specifications of Request for Applications 2014-114 (the RFA). If so, whether Florida Housing’s decision to fund the application submitted by HTG Wellington Family, LLC (HTG Wellington), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Protester failed to establish standing or that its application should be approved for funding.
14-001361BID  HERITAGE AT POMPANO HOUSING PARTNERS, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits to Wisdom Village Crossing, LP (Wisdom Village), and Oakland Preserve, LLC (Oakland Preserve), is contrary to governing statutes, Respondent's rules, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioner did not prove that scoring on proposed funding awards were contrary to statute, rule, or RFA, or were clearly erroneous, contrary to competion, arbitrary or capricious.
14-001362BID  HTG BROWARD 3, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits to Wisdom Village Crossing, LP (Wisdom Village), and Oakland Preserve, LLC (Oakland Preserve), is contrary to governing statutes, Respondent's rules, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioner did not prove that scoring on proposed funding awards were contrary to statute, rule, or RFA, or were clearly erroneous, contrary to competion, arbitrary or capricious.
14-001398BID  PINNACLE RIO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001399BID  PINNACLE RIO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001400BID  TOWN CENTER PHASE TWO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001428BID  APC FOUR FORTY FOUR, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
13-002898BID  DUVAL PARK, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 01, 2013
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to fund the application of Petitioner Duval Park, Ltd. (Duval Park), is contrary to its governing statutes, rules, policies, or the proposal specifications.Proposed funding award was not shown to be contrary to statute, rule, policy, or RFP, nor was proposed award clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer