Okaloosa FL Lawyers | Michael William Mead -- eLawyers

Michael William Mead

Visitors: 29

850-243-3135

Bar #174938(FL) License for 50 years

Fort Walton Beach FL

Are you Michael William Mead? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 253.77, 26.012, 440.02, 440.10, 440.107, 440.12, 440.38, 760.01, 760.11

51516, 51529 Smith v. Venus Condominium Ass'n, Inc. (1977)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 31, 1977 Citations: 352 So. 2d 1169

352 So. 2d 1169 (1977) Richard P. SMITH et ux., et al., Petitioners, v. VENUS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Respondent. MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. George IHLE, Respondent. Nos. 51516, 51529. Supreme Court of Florida. October 31, 1977. Rehearing Denied January 9, 1978. *1170 Michael William Mead, of Middleton & Mead, Fort Walton Beach, for petitioners Richard P. Smith, et ux., et al. Robert T. Hyde, Jr., of Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, Jacksonville, and George N. Jahn, of..

98-275, 98-274 Fuchs v. Robbins (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 16, 1999 Citations: 738 So. 2d 338

738 So. 2d 338 (1998) Lawrence FUCHS, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Joel W. ROBBINS, etc., Appellee. Nos. 98-275, 98-274. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 18, 1998. Opinion Granting Rehearing July 16, 1999. *339 Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, Assistant Attorney General; Bloom & Minsker, Miami; Arnaldo Velez, Miami, for appellants. Robert A. Ginsburg, Dade County Attorney, and Jay W. Williams, Assistant County Attorney, for appel..

85-928 Heston v. State (1986)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 1986 Citations: 484 So. 2d 84

484 So. 2d 84 (1986) Mary Dressel HESTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 85-928. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 5, 1986. *85 Jack T. Edmund, Bartow, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kim W. Munch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee. GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge. Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain her convictions of aggravated assault and culpable negligence. There were substantial conflicts in the te..

BC-126 Tallahassee Housing Auth. v. UNEMPL. COM'N (1985)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 11, 1985 Citations: 463 So. 2d 1216

463 So. 2d 1216 (1985) TALLAHASSEE HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and Connell Barron, Appellees. No. BC-126. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 11, 1985. Paula L. Walborsky and Edgar C. Booth of Booth & Walborsky, and James C. Conner, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant. *1217 Janet L. Smith, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Com'n. WIGGINTON, Judge. Appellant, Tallahassee Housing Authority, an employer, appeals an ord..

09-004190 RUBEN C. FERNANDEZ vs EMERALD WASTE SERVICE (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2009

The issue is whether Respondent discriminated against Petitioner based on his national origin in violation of Section 760.10(1), Florida Statutes (2008).Petitioner did not prove that Respondent discriminated against him based on his national origan.

06-003296 JOHN WOOLSHLAGER vs KEITH ROCKMAN AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 01, 2006

The issues are whether Keith Rockman's construction of a dock and other structures on Choctawhatchee Bay in Fort Walton Beach, Florida, is exempt from Wetland Resource Permit requirements, and whether authorization to use sovereign submerged lands for the project should be given.The dock extension did not create a navigational hazard for neighbors or the Intracoastal waterway. The project is exempt for a permit.

05-001732 ROBERT DONOVAN CONSTRUCTION INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 13, 2005

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Petitioner properly secured the payment of workers' compensation benefits for employees by securing proper workers' compensation insurance coverage, as delineated by Subsection 440.107(2), Florida Statutes (2004) and, if not, what if any penalty for such failure is warranted.Petitioner considered the subcontractors` certificates of insurance as proof that workers` comp. insurance had been secured. Respondent cannot treat both the general contractor and subcontractors as employers in determining responsibility for insurance.

02-004809 PERRY HESLEP vs PAYROLL MANAGEMENT, INC. (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 2002

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Petitioner, Perry Heslep, has suffered discrimination in his employment by being terminated because of his age.Petitioner did not appear. Respondent showed legitimate reason for moving Petitioner to a more supervised position; Petitioner refused, resulting in termination. Petitioner showed no evidence to rebut fact that termination was for poor performance.