welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Paige Billings Shoemaker
Paige Billings Shoemaker
Paige Billings Shoemaker
Visitors: 93
0
Bar #143022(FL)     License for 27 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Paige Billings Shoemaker? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.573, 120.68, 153.87, 173.08, 180.24, 200.001, 213.30, 28.05, 295.05, 298.20, 298.341, 384.24, 440.01, 440.02, 440.05, 440.10, 440.105, 440.107, 440.12, 440.13, 440.16, 440.38, 695.27, 7.62

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.2015, 69L-6.012, 69L-6.015, 69L-6.019, 69L-6.021, 69L-6.027, 69L-6.028, 69L-6.030, 69L-6.031

09-003858  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs ABNER, INC.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 2009
The issues are whether Respondent violated Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to obtain workers' compensation insurance, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent violated Chapter. 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to secure workers' compensation for its employees.
09-002321  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs DAVID BUMGARNER  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 2009
The issue in the case is whether David Bumgarner (Respondent) should be assessed a penalty for an alleged failure to obtain workers' compensation coverage for his employees.Respondent's workers' compensation coverage failed to meet Florida requirements.
09-001778  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs MAJESTIC CUSTOM HOMES AND REALTY, INC.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2009
The issue for determination is whether Respondent failed to secure workers’ compensation coverage in violation of the requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Law, Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, as set forth in the Stop-Work Order issued on February 11, 2009, and, if so, whether Respondent should be assessed the penalty set forth in the 3rd Amended Order of Penalty Assessment issued on April 7, 2009.Petitioner demonstrated that Respondent failed to secure workers' compensation coverage and that Respondent's employees continued to work during the effective period of the stop-work order; hence, the penalty was warranted and was correct.
09-001000  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs DICE CONSTRUCTION, INC.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 2009
The issues are whether Respondent failed to secure the payment of workers' compensation insurance, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Clear and convincing evidence indicates that Respondent failed to secure workers' compensation insurance and failed to produce records sufficient to calculate a penalty. Therefore, Petitioner properly imputed the payroll to determine the penalty.
09-001575  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs GREG SHAMBLIN CONSTRUCTION, INC.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 2009
The issue is whether Respondent is liable for a penalty of $44,794.51 for the alleged failure to maintain workers' compensation insurance for two employees in violation of Chapter 440, Florida Statutes (2008).1The evidence is less than clear and convincing that two unlisted workers were not covered by workers' compensation insurance.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer