Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Jun. 12, 2007
Whether, in making a preliminary decision to award a contract for the subject services, Respondent acted contrary to a governing statute, rule, policy, or project specification; and, if so, whether such misstep(s) was/were clearly erroneous, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to competition. Also at issue is whether Petitioner’s response to the subject Request for Proposal (RFP) was responsive and whether Petitioner has standing to bring this proceeding.Petitioner`s bid was non-responsive. Respondent had insufficient information to ensure that Intervenor was a responsible bidder.
