Palm Beach FL Lawyers | Paul B Erickson -- eLawyers

Ago (1977)

Florida Attorney General Reports Filed: Sep. 13, 1977

QUESTION: Is the franchise charge or fee imposed upon the Florida Gas Company pursuant to its franchise agreement with the City of St. Petersburg, and a proportionate part of which is separately stated on its bills rendered to the St. Petersburg Community College, a tax from which the college is immune SUMMARY: A contractual franchise charge or fee imposed upon or exacted from a public utility by a municipality in consideration for special privileges granted the utility by the municipality and s..

88-5580 (1989)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Aug. 21, 1989 Citations: 880 F.2d 1267

880 F.2d 1267 FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Sunrise Savings and Loan Association, a Federal Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TWO RIVERS ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Defendants, Robert H. Smith, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5580. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Aug. 21, 1989. Elizabeth T. Maass, Alley, Maass, Rogers, Lindsay & Chauncey, Paul B. Erickson, Palm Beach, Fla., for defendant-appellant. Cary A. Woodfield, Squire, Sanders..

87-5539 (1989)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Jun. 08, 1989 Citations: 874 F.2d 1509

874 F.2d 1509 FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN INSURANCE CORP., as receiver for Sunrise Savings & Loan Assoc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D & D GOLFVIEW PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN INSURANCE CORP., as receiver for Sunrise Savings & Loan Assoc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellee. FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN INSURANCE CORP., as receiver for Sunrise Savings & Loan Assoc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bengt BLOOM, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-5539. Un..

81-8017 (1983)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Sep. 19, 1983 Citations: 715 F.2d 531

715 F.2d 531 74 A.L.R.Fed. 783 Edwin F. GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. John HEIMANN, U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. Edwin F. GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John HEIMANN, U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 81-8017, 81-8018. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept. 19, 1983. Julian D. Halliburton, pro se. John W. Stokes, Jr., Decatur, Ga., for Gordon. Jeffrey M. Smith, Trotter, Bond..

80-5797 (1982)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Aug. 30, 1982 Citations: 684 F.2d 736

684 F.2d 736 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,787 Edwin F. GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George A. TERRY, Sr., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Edwin F. GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. M. OVERSTREET, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Edwin F. GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. G. GREEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Edwin F. GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOBE PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Edwin F. GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William Hershey HAMM, III, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos..

80-739, 80-740, 80-744, 80-752, 80-753 and 80-2216 Proprietors Ins. Co. v. Valsecchi (1983)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 28, 1983 Citations: 435 So. 2d 290

435 So. 2d 290 (1983) PROPRIETORS INSURANCE COMPANY, Deland Aviation, Inc., O.R. Hunt, and Dean V. West, Appellants, v. John and Janet VALSECCHI, Individually and As Personal Representatives of the Estate of Robert J. Valsecchi and Ann and Richard Scileppi, Individually and As Personal Representatives of the Estate of Richard William Scileppi, and Caetano Da S. Vital, Administrator of the Estate of Lawrence J. Vital, Deceased, Appellees. Nos. 80-739, 80-740, 80-744, 80-752, 80-753 and 80-2216. Di..

84-2471 State v. McMahon (1986)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 1986 Citations: 485 So. 2d 884

485 So. 2d 884 (1986) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Arthur McMAHON, Appellee. No. 84-2471. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 26, 1986. *885 Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant. James Campbell, New Port Richey, for appellee. SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge. A jury found appellee Arthur McMahon guilty of second degree murder in the beating death of his mother. Thereafter, the trial court granted appellee's motion for ..

5D08-3113 PARLER v. State (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2010 Citations: 37 So. 3d 871

37 So. 3d 871 (2010) PARLER v. STATE. No. 5D08-3113. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 11, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

07-004116 PETER J. PEDICINI vs STUART YACHT CORPORATION AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 12, 2007

On August 14, 2007, the Department issued a Notice of Determination of Qualification for a Noticed General Permit to Stuart Yacht Corporation to remove an existing dock and to construct a new dock in a manmade canal connected to the South Fork of the St. Lucie River in Stuart, Martin County, Florida. A timely petition challenging the proposed agency action was filed by Petitioner. The Department referred the matter to DOAH to conduct an evidentiary hearing. In referring the matter to DOAH, the Department expressly reserved its right to object to Petitioner’s standing to initiate this proceeding.Recommend that the petition challenging a dock permit be dismissed for lack of standing.

91-003827GM RESTIGOUCHE, INC. vs TOWN OF JUPITER AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 1991

Whether Petitioner is a "substantially affected person," within the meaning of Section 163.3123, Florida Statutes? Whether there were any procedural prerequisites to instituting the instant administrative proceeding that Petitioner was required to, but did not, meet? Whether the action taken by the Town of Jupiter which is the subject of the instant administrative proceeding constitutes a "land development regulation," within the meaning of Section 163.3123, Florida Statutes? Whether the action taken by the Town of Jupiter which is the subject of the instant administrative proceeding is "consistent," within the meaning of Section 163.3123, Florida Statutes, with the Town of Jupiter Comprehensive Plan? Whether Respondents are entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Section 163.3213(8), Florida Statutes?Ordinance prohibiting in overlay zone certain uses otherwise permitted by underlying zoning is not Land Development Regulations subject to administrative challenge.

Paul B Erickson