Leon FL and Administrative law Lawyers | Peter Chase Cunnin -- eLawyers

80-5314 Florida Power & Light Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1982)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Aug. 27, 1982 Citations: 683 F.2d 941

683 F.2d 941 17 ERC 2055 , 68 A.L.R.Fed. 965, 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,071 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Douglas M. COSTLE, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. No. 80-5314. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit B * Aug. 27, 1982. Hopping, Boyd, Green & Sams, Peter Chase Cunningham, William H. Green, Gary P. Sams, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner. John C. Bottcher, Deputy Gen. Counsel, State of Fla., De..

15-001559EPP FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT POWER PLANT UNITS 3-5 MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION vs * (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2015

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Governor and Cabinet, in their capacity as the Siting Board and pursuant to the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act (“PPSA”), should approve FPL’s request to modify the Conditions of Certification for Units 3, 4, and 5 of the Turkey Point Power Plant in southeast Miami-Dade County.FPL demonstrated that the proposed modification complies with all applicable regulating criteria and with the certification criteria in the Power Plant Siting Act.

03-004391EPP IN RE: FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT TURKEY POINT UNIT POWER PLANT SITING APPLICATION NO. PA 03-45 vs * (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 21, 2003

The Site Certification Application to add a combined cycle steam generator at Florida Power & Light`s Turkey Point Electric Power Plant met all land use and zoning requirements.

02-000573EPP IN RE: FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT MARTIN UNIT 8 POWER PLANT SITING APPLICATION NO. PA89-27A vs * (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 08, 2002

The issue to be resolved in this portion of this power plant site certification proceeding is whether the site for the proposed Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) Martin Unit 8 Expansion Project (Project) is consistent and in compliance with the existing land use plans and zoning ordinances of Martin County, Florida, pursuant to Section 403.508(2), Florida Statutes.Florida Power & Light showed compliance with existing land use plan and zoning ordinances pursuant to Section 403.508(2), Florida Statutes. Certification justified pursuant to Section 403.501 et. seq., F.S. under the Electrical Power Plant Siting Act.

02-000937EPP IN RE: FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT MANATEE UNIT 3 POWER PLANT SITING APPLICATION NO. PA 02-44 vs * (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 01, 2002

Florida Power & Light proved it could construct and operate a new 1100 megawatt combined-cycle electrical generating unit located at FPL`s existing Manatee Plant site in Manatee County, in accordance with Section 403.201, et seq, Florida Statutes.

94-005675EPP IN RE: FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, MANATEE ORIMULSION PROJECT, APPLICATION NO. 94-35 vs * (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 07, 1994

This proceeding was conducted pursuant to the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act, Section 403, Part II, Florida Statutes (F.S.), to determine whether final certification should be granted for FPL's Manatee Orimulsion Conversion Project (Project), and if certification is granted, what conditions of certification should be imposed.Siting Board remanded for findings on new proposed conditions of site certif. for FPL's proposed Orimulsion conversion projects after District Court vacated Bd's FO denying certification. Additional conditions also were considered. RO: certify project.

95-004829 MANASOTA-88, INC., AND MANATEE COUNTY SAVE OUR BAYS ASSOCIATION, INC. (PSD-FL-219)(PA 94-35) vs FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 03, 1995

This proceeding was conducted pursuant to Section 120.57, F.S., to determine whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should grant a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) air construction permit for Florida Power & Light Company's (FPL's) Manatee Orimulsion Conversion Project (Project), and if such a permit is granted, what conditions should be imposed.When Siting Board remanded companion EPP case, DEP remanded PSD case without issuing a FO. Supplemental RO found that, under new proposed conditions, no BACT determination for NOx would be necessary, and that PSD permits should be issued.

89-006636EPP FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (LAUDERDALE REPOWERING PROJECT) vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 01, 1989

Whether the proposed site of the Lauderdale Repowering Project is consistent and in compliance with existing land use plans and zoning ordinances.Certification of repowering project recommended with conditions.'

Peter Chase Cunningham