welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Rawsi Williams
Rawsi Williams
Rawsi Williams
Visitors: 101
0
Bar #103201(FL)     License for 12 years
Miami FL

Are you Rawsi Williams? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 408.804, 408.809, 408.810, 408.812, 408.814, 408.815, 408.831, 409.913, 429.02, 429.04, 429.07, 429.14, 57.105

Florida Administrative Code: 59A-35.040, 59G-9.070

5D16-1314  Travis J. Ash v. State  (2018)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 01, 2018
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TRAVIS JERMAINE ASH, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-1314 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed January 5, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Flagler County, Dennis Craig and Matthew M. Foxman , Judges. Anthony M. Candela, of Candela Law Firm, P.A., Riverview, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. C..
2D11-4111  Williams v. State  (2012)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 2012 Citations: 81 So. 3d 429
81 So. 3d 429 (2012) WILLIAMS v. STATE. No. 2D11-4111. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 22, 2012. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
3D11-307  Conesa v. Universal Property & Cas. Ins. Co.  (2012)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 07, 2012 Citations: 84 So. 3d 323
84 So. 3d 323 (2012) CONESA v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CAS. INS. CO. No. 3D11-307. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 7, 2012. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
15-000982  FLO-RONKE, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2015
Fact Issues Did Petitioner, Flo-Ronke, Inc. (Flo-Ronke), fail to timely pay a fine imposed by Final Order of the Respondent, Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency)? Did the Agency reject attempts by Flo-Ronke to timely pay the fine in full by a single payment without conditions? Did Flo-Ronke attempt to pay the fine untimely in full by a single payment without conditions? If so, did the Agency reject the proffered payment? Did Flo-Ronke employ an individual in a position that required background screening who had a disqualifying criminal conviction? Law Issues Which party bears the burden of proof? What is the standard of proof? Do the facts support denying re-licensure of Flo-Ronke? Are untimely efforts to pay the fine in full with a single payment mitigating factors? If so, how should the factors be weighed?An award of fees under sec. 57.105 requires proof that the fees motion was served on the opposing party at least 21 days before it was filed. The requirement is absolute. Since the motion was not served 21 days before filing, it was denied.
20-002100  DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES vs KIDDIE ISLAND ACADEMY, LLC  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2020
Did Respondent, Kiddie Island, LLC (Kiddie Island), commit child abuse or neglect as defined in chapter 39 or 827 of the 2019 Florida Statutes and therefore violate the standards of sections 402.301 through 402.319 of the Florida Statutes, as implemented by section 8.2(A) of the Child Care Facility Handbook (Handbook) of Petitioner, Department of Children and Families (Department)?1 If so, what is the proper sanction? Did Kiddie Island fail to report suspected child abuse as required by section 39.201, as implemented by section 8.2(B) of the Handbook? If so, what is the proper sanction?To impose sanctions DCF must prove violation with clear & convincing evidence. DCF did not prove child abuse by provider. "Abuse" is more than improper care. Alleged abuse must cause or be likely to cause significant impairment to physical health.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer