Leon FL Lawyers | Reba Elizabeth Atchison -- eLawyers

96-000511 KENNETH GAUTHREAUX vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 29, 1996

The issue for determination at final hearing is whether the Petitioner is eligible for licensure by the Board of Architecture.Petitioner failed to show that test was faulty or that grading was devoid of logic and reason. Dismiss exam challenge and deny licensure.

96-002862 ALFRED SIMMONS vs CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 1996

Whether the petitioner is entitled to credit for the answers given to the challenged questions in the General Contractor’s examination administered October 18, 1995.Test questions were not graded in arbitrary and capricious manner. Questions were clear and unambiguous and correct answers were supported by references.

97-002368 KENNETH E. MARSHALL vs CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 16, 1997

Whether Petitioner is entitled to additional credit for his responses to Questions 23 and 27 of the Contract Administration section of the General Contractor licensure examination administered in July 1996, and, if so, whether the additional credit would give him a passing grade. Whether Petitioner is entitled to additional credit for his responses to Questions 11, 23, and 35 of the Contract Administration section of the General Contractor licensure examination administered in April 1997 and, if so, whether the additional credit would give him a passing grade.Candidate's licensure exams were properly graded.

97-000068 ROGER E. YATES vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 1997

Whether Petitioner should be given credit for an examination question on the Florida Jurisdictional Essay Exam for Surveyors and Mappers taken by Petitioner in April, 1996.Department gave Petitioner requested points but Petitioner still failed examination.

98-002545 PATRICIA A. PARSON CRAWFORD vs BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 1998

Is Petitioner entitled to the receipt of an additional point(s) for her cosmetology examination given by Respondent on December 17, 1997?Petitioner proved entitlement to adjustment for score recieved for answer to one question on examination, but did not pass.

98-003634 JUAN CARLOS PEREZ vs ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 12, 1998

Whether the Respondent should receive a passing grade on the Alarm Systems I Contractor Examination administered January 30, 1998.Petitioner not entitled to credit for answers to challenged questions. Correct answers were in reference materials available to Petitioner.

99-000155 TANA SHIVER vs BARBER`S BOARD (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 11, 1999

The issue in this case is whether the Petitioner should be awarded additional points for the practical portion of the September 14, 1998, Barber Examination.Examiner grading discrepancy warrants allowing Petitioner to retake practical examination without cost.

01-000604 BENNY CHESTNUT vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2001

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding is whether Petitioner's name should be cleared.Evidence demonstrated Petitioner did not sexually harass five women at work; therefore, name should be cleared.

99-000601 JOE SENFAR vs ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 04, 1999

Whether the Respondent should receive a passing grade on the Alarm Systems Contractor II Examination administered July 24, 1998.Petitioner failed to prove that he should have received credit for answers to eight examination questions. The petition should be dismissed.

99-001230BID KNAUS SYSTEMS, INC. OF FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 1999

The issue is whether Respondent's proposed decision to award a computer-maintenance contract to Intervenor is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Evaluators` lack of financial qualifications, coupled with their clearly erroneous scoring of the winner`s offer on one financial criterion, rendered the proposed award contrary to statute, rule, policy, and the Request for Proposals.

Reba Elizabeth Atchison