Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Richard A Feldman
Richard A Feldman
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #24130(FL)     License for 69 years; Member in Good Standing
Bradenton FL

Are you Richard A Feldman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569120.57408.031408.040408.045

98-7086    (1999)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Apr. 15, 1999 Citations: 173 F.3d 481
173 F.3d 481 RED BALL INTERIOR DEMOLITION CORP. and John Palmadessa, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, William Dunnegan, Appellant, v. Daniel PALMADESSA, William Palmadessa, Supreme Recycling, Inc., Donald Palmadessa and Fortune Interior Dismantling Corp., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees, 110 Sand Company, Movant-Appellee. Nos. 98-7086(L), 98-7174(CON). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued March 3, 1999. Decided April 15, 1999. Neal Fellenbaum, Zegen & Fellenbaum,..
96-7896    (1997)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Feb. 03, 1997 Citations: 107 F.3d 4
107 F.3d 4 NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. RED BALL INTERIOR DEMOLITION CORP. and John Palmadessa, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel PALMADESSA, Donald Palmadessa, William Palmadessa, Supreme Recycling, Inc., and Fortune Interior Dismantling Corp., Defendants-Ap..
RR-97  Munroe Memorial Hospital v. Thompson  (1980)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 1980 Citations: 388 So. 2d 1338
388 So. 2d 1338 (1980) MUNROE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and All Risk Corp. of Florida, Appellants, v. Ella Mae THOMPSON, Appellee. No. RR-97. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 10, 1980. Bruce R. Kaster of Pattilo, MacKay & McKeever, P.A., Ocala, for appellants. Charles C. Hurt, Orlando, for appellee. THOMPSON, Judge. The appellants challenge a compensation order, contending that they did not receive adequate notice of the nature of the employee's claim for compensation, and tha..
17-003598  CRESTWOOD NURSING CENTER, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 2017
The issue is whether the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) properly denied Crestwood Nursing Center, Inc.’s (Crestwood), request for a 60-day extension of the validity period of its certificate of need (CON) No. 10358. A corollary issue raised by Crestwood is whether it was “induced and lulled” into relying on the alleged procedures as set forth in AHCA’s September 16, 2016, letter, and thus whether the theory of equitable estoppel applies. Finally, Crestwood alleges that AHCA acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying its extension request.Crestwood failed to demonstrate its entitlement to an extension of its CON under section 408.040 and rule 59C-1.018. Accordingly, AHCA properly denied Crestwood's request.
3D07-1660  Martin v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 13, 2008 Citations: 981 So. 2d 1212
981 So. 2d 1212 (2008) MARTIN v. STATE. No. 3D07-1660. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 13, 2008. Decision without published opinion. App. dismissed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer