Hendry FL Lawyers | Richard Sullivan -- eLawyers

Richard Sullivan

Visitors: 87

Bar #73040(FL) License for 28 years; Member in Good Standing

Labelle FL

Are you Richard Sullivan? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Opinion No. 57-0615 (1957)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Filed: Jun. 15, 1957

OPINION — AG — ** DEFINITION OF WORD " PAWNEE " ** IF (BUT ONLY IF) THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD FINDS THAT IT IS UNNECESSARY TO EXPEND ALL OR ANY PORTION OF THE AMOUNTS APPROPRIATED TO SAID BOARD BY SECT. 1 OF SENATE BILL NO. 104 FOR THE " INDIAN EXPOSITION — PAWNEE " FOR SAID SPECIFIC PURPOSE; THEN SAID UNNECESSARY AMOUNTS MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO ANY OTHER ITEM OF APPROPRIATION CONTAINED IN SECT. 1 (IN THE MANNER PROVIDED BY 62 Ohio St. 41 .12 [ 62-41.12 ]) AND EXPENDED FOR ANY PURPO..

1998 United States v. Robert Schreiber, Michael Franks, Brent Gilpin, and Susan Scainetti, John Bianco (1999)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Sep. 02, 1999 Citations: 191 F.3d 103

191 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ROBERT SCHREIBER, MICHAEL FRANKS, BRENT GILPIN, and SUSAN SCAINETTI, Defendants, JOHN BIANCO, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 98-1462 August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Argued: May 13, 1999 Decided: September 02, 1999 Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Loretta A. Preska, Judge) entered August 20, 1998, following appellant's guilty pl..

96-1186 United States v. Lamont Hogan (1996)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Oct. 31, 1996

104 F.3d 352 NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lamont HOGAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-1186. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Oct. 31, 1996. Appearing for Appellant: Charles D. Adler, Goltzer & Adler, New Yo..

3D02-2063 Demorizi v. Demorizi (2003)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 2003

851 So. 2d 243 (2003) Melida A. DEMORIZI, Appellant, v. Nestor M. DEMORIZI, Appellee. No. 3D02-2063. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 30, 2003. *244 Peter H. Kircher, Miami, for appellant. Curtis W. Brannon, Shalimar; and Mary A. Swayze, Miami, for appellee. Before COPE and RAMIREZ, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge. NESBITT, Senior Judge. This is an appeal from the trial court's order dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, appellant Melida A. Demorizi's motion..

Richard Sullivan

Opinion No. 57-0615 (1957)

1998 United States v. Robert Schreiber, Michael Franks, Brent Gilpin, and Susan Scainetti, John Bianco (1999)

96-1186 United States v. Lamont Hogan (1996)

3D02-2063 Demorizi v. Demorizi (2003)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.