welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Robert Dwane Pritt
Robert Dwane Pritt
Robert Dwane Pritt
Visitors: 178
1
Bar #196571(FL)     License for 50 years; Member in Good Standing
Bonita Springs FL

Are you Robert Dwane Pritt? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

01-002114RP  THOMAS D. MCGILL, RONALD J. PRITCHARD, DANIEL J. DVORAK, ROBERT H. ATKINS, AND RUSSELL P. GENTILE vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 31, 2001
The issue is whether proposed regulations for Brevard County manatee protection areas by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), which are amendments to Rule 68C- 22.006, Florida Administrative Code, noticed in the April 20, 2001, Florida Administrative Weekly (F.A.W.)("Proposed Rule"), with a Notice of Change published in the F.A.W. on June 15, 2001, are an invalid exercise of legislative authority.Challenges to proposed rule are dismissed. Proposed rule not vague and does not exceed delegated legislative authority.
01-002197RP  STANDING WATCH, INC.; JIM KALVIN; THOMAS MASON; DOUGLAS P. JAREN; AND STOWELL ROBERTSON vs FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 2001
The issue is whether proposed regulations for Brevard County manatee protection areas by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), which are amendments to Rule 68C- 22.006, Florida Administrative Code, noticed in the April 20, 2001, Florida Administrative Weekly (F.A.W.)("Proposed Rule"), with a Notice of Change published in the F.A.W. on June 15, 2001, are an invalid exercise of legislative authority.Challenges to proposed rule are dismissed. Proposed rule not vague and does not exceed delegated legislative authority.
01-002198RP  SEA RAY BOATS, INC. vs FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 2001
The issue is whether proposed regulations for Brevard County manatee protection areas by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), which are amendments to Rule 68C- 22.006, Florida Administrative Code, noticed in the April 20, 2001, Florida Administrative Weekly (F.A.W.)("Proposed Rule"), with a Notice of Change published in the F.A.W. on June 15, 2001, are an invalid exercise of legislative authority.Challenges to proposed rule are dismissed. Proposed rule not vague and does not exceed delegated legislative authority.
01-003992  SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB, INC., vs SEA RAY BOATS, INC., AND FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
The issue is whether proposed regulations for Brevard County manatee protection areas by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), which are amendments to Rule 68C- 22.006, Florida Administrative Code, noticed in the April 20, 2001, Florida Administrative Weekly (F.A.W.)("Proposed Rule"), with a Notice of Change published in the F.A.W. on June 15, 2001, are an invalid exercise of legislative authority.Challenges to proposed rule are dismissed. Proposed rule not vague and does not exceed delegated legislative authority.
91-003770  JOHN ARMENIA vs BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 19, 1991
The issues in this proceeding concern whether a site, which the Petitioner proposes to develop by installing an elevated timber bridge across Clam Bayou on Sanibel Island, is within the Pine Island Sound Aquatic Preserve ("preserve") established in 1970 by resolution of the Respondent, Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund ("Board"). The Petitioner also contends, in Case No. 91-3249R, consolidated for hearing with Case No. 91-3770, that a statement contained in a DNR letter of April 2, 1991 and ratified by later action of the Board, constitutes an unpromulgated rule, by virtue of being an amendment to the existing rule describing the limits of the subject preserve, and thus is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Law favors interpret of legal description which gives effect to all its words. also look to intent of grantor and survey principles ests by expert

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer