Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Robert Kyle Guinn
Robert Kyle Guinn
Visitors: 11
0
Bar #85937(FL)     License for 14 years
Miami FL

Are you Robert Kyle Guinn? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

98-000434  OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER, DIVISION OF SECURITIES AND INVESTOR PROTECTION vs GEORGE BECKHAN, BRIAN BECKHAM AND PIONEER CAPITAL, INC., A/K/A PIONEER CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 26, 1998
Whether the Respondents, George Beckham, Brian Beckham, and Pioneer Capital, Inc., violated Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, by failing to register as investment advisers, committed fraud in the rendering of investment advice, sold unsuitable investments to an investor, or failed to advise a client of all futures market positions held by them on behalf of the client.Associated person paid for trading commodities; guilty of two counts of misstatement of a material fact; guilty of one count of failure to tell an investor material information; guilty of permitting client to invest in risky investment.
92-000685  DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE vs MERIDIAN MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., AND JOAN N. HARNAGEL  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 1992
Whether Petitioner proved the factual allegations of the Administrative Complaint, whether those factual allegations establish that the Respondents violated provisions of the Florida Mortgage Brokerage Act, and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Revocation of licensure and fine recommended where mortgage broker committed multiple violations including escrow account violations.
91-000704  DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE vs ERIC PEPPER  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 1991
An Administrative Complaint and Cease and Desist Order was filed by the Department of Banking and Finance on March 29, 1990, against the Respondent and thirty-one other persons, alleging various violations of Chapter 517, Florida Statutes (the "Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act"). The only allegation of wrongdoing by Eric Pepper is that he offered or sold an unregistered security in violation of Section 517.07, Florida Statutes. The issues for disposition are whether that violation was committed and if so, what discipline should be imposed. The facts are substantially uncontroverted. Respondent opposes the penalty offered by Petitioner as inappropriate.Repondent sold securities prior to their registration. Suspended 1 year, plus $315 fine, the amount he made on commission
90-002509  DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE vs ROBERT MICALIZIO  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 26, 1990
An Administrative Complaint and cease and desist order was filed by the Department of Banking and Finance on March 29, 1990, against Respondent and thirty-one other persons, alleging various violations of Chapter 517, F.S., the "Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act". The only allegation of wrongdoing by Robert Micalizio is that he offered or sold an unregistered security in violation of Section 517.07, F.S. He admits contacting investors, but claims those contacts were to obtain indications of interest (IOI) which are not proscribed. The issue for resolution in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the alleged violation and if so, what discipline is appropriate.Respondent offered sale of securities prior to registration-not mere indication of interest - fined and suspended.
90-001184  DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE vs BANKERS ACCEPTANCE OF AMERICA, DAN NORMAN, AND JULIA NORMAN  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 26, 1990
The issue for consideration herein is whether Respondents should be disciplined as proposed in the Cease and Desist Order And Complaint filed herein because of the alleged misconduct outlined therein.Credit repair service which was no more than come-on for real estate sales gimmick properly treated as and subject to requirements of credit sts statute.
89-004558  DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE vs HANOVER FARMS, INC.  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 23, 1989
The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is guilty of the violations alleged in the order to cease and desist dated June 6, 1989, as amended by the allegations set forth in the motion filed December 29, 1989; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent found to have engaged in sale of security based upon application of the so-called "3 pronged test". Respondent failed to register to sell security

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer