Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Roberta Jill Fox
Roberta Jill Fox
Visitors: 14
0
Bar #234745(FL)     License for 47 years
Orlando FL

Are you Roberta Jill Fox? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

96-002868  GLORIA D. GARCIA vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, N/K/A DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 17, 1996
The issue for determination is what should be the award to Petitioner as to back pay, interest on the amount awarded, retirement system contributions, attorney's fees, and costs.Remand by appellate court for award of back pay, attorney`s fees, costs, retirement contributions and statutory interest, calculated to be $35,148.24; $96,075.00; $14,899.30; $7,110.16; and 6% per annum, respectively. Also suggested no break in service.
99-005364  CHRISTOPHER RAYBORN vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 23, 1999
Whether the Petitioner, Christopher Rayborn, is entitled to participate in the Florida Retirement System (FRS).Temporary employee retained for longer than six months who did not receive benefits but was compensated with higher wage is not eligible for FRS participation.
94-005193  HOLLY HEIGHTS MANOR vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 19, 1994
Whether Petitioner's application for a license to operate Holly Heights Manor as an adult congregate living facility (hereinafter referred to as an "ACLF") should be denied for the reason cited in the Agency for Health Care Administration's August 25, 1994, letter notifying Petitioner of its intention to deny its application?Although Adult Congregate Living Facility did not meet min stand as of last survey of facility, given apparent progress made since there should be another survey before final decision on license.
93-002723  DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs WILFREDO D. RIVERA-CARDE  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 1993
This is a case in which the Petitioner seeks to suspend and terminate the Respondent's employment on the basis of allegations of misconduct set forth in a Notice of Specific Charges. The allegations of misconduct charge the Respondent with immorality, misconduct in office, incompetency, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude.Teacher charged with misconduct involving improper touching of andcomments to student should be reinstated where evidence is insufficient to prove charges

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer