Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Robin Lynn Suarez
Robin Lynn Suarez
Visitors: 58
0
Bar #823287(FL)     License for 35 years
Orlando FL

Are you Robin Lynn Suarez? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

12-001212  ROBERT SUAREZ AND CARIDAD ESPINOSA vs HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND MIGUEL DEL CAMPILLO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE HACMB  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2012
The issue is whether either respondent engaged in a discriminatory housing practice against Petitioners, based on their national origin and age, in violation of the Florida Fair Housing Act, sections 760.20-760.36, Florida Statutes.Pet failed to prove housing discrim. Age not a protected category. For natl origin, Pets failed to prove prima facie case. ALJ denied Pets' req to broaden grounds of discrim to disability and retaliation and Resps' req for fees and costs under 120.595(1).
96-004643  FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs LEONARD W. TANNER, O/B/O ZEPHYR SPRINGS MEMBER`S ASSOCIATION, INC., ZEPHYR SPRINGS MEMBER`S ASSOCIATION,  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 30, 1996
The issues in this case are whether Respondents violated Sections 498.023(1)(a), 498.023(2)(a), 498.035(1), and 498.049(5), Florida Statutes (1997), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61B-9.003(1), by participating in the offer or disposition of subdivided lands that are neither exempt, registered, nor approved for the taking of reservation deposits, by failing to deliver a current public offering statement to each purchaser, and by disseminating advertising materials prior to filing for approval by Petitioner for the subdivided lands and what, if any, penalty should be imposed. (All references to chapters and sections are to Florida Statutes (1997) unless otherwise stated. Unless otherwise stated, all references to rules are to rules promulgated in the Florida Administrative Code in effect as of the date of this Recommended Order.)Petitioner failed to show that father of two sons who developed mobile home park was subdivider, participated in offer or disposition of an interest in land, or otherwise acted in any capacity other than that of a creditor or limited partner.
97-000837  FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs VANTAGE VIEW, INC., D/B/A VANTAGE VIEW CONDOMINIUM  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 1997
Whether Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Amended Notice to Show Cause and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Condominium Association willfully withheld information from one of its owners contrary to statute making records available to unit owners.
95-000630RU  FLORIDA MANUFACTURED HOUSING ASSOCIATION, INC. vs FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 10, 1995
Whether the proposed repeal of Rule 61B-31.001(5), Florida Administrative Code, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Further, whether certain agency policies constitute rules and violate the provisions of Section 120.535, Florida Statutes.Agency repeal of rule is invalid delegation.
91-008321F  EMAD F. ABDELMESEH, D/B/A EMADS TEXACO vs DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 30, 1991
Whether Petitioner, Emad F. Abdelmeseh, d/b/a Emad's Texaco is entitled to recover attorney's fees and costs in defending the charges made against him in the case of Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco vs. Emad F. Abdelmeseh, d/b/a Emad's Texaco, Division of Administrative Hearings, Case No. 91-1618, under the provisions of Section 57.111, Florida Statutes, and Rule 60Q-2.035, Florida Administrative Code (formerly 22I-6.035, Florida Administrative Code) and, if so, the amount which Petitioner is entitled to recover.Where there is credible evidence of a violation at time issuing notice to show cause - agency has met burden of substantial justification.
90-004561  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs DAVID L. CREWS, T/A CREWS TEXACO  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 1991
The issues for determination are whether Respondent, holder of an alcoholic beverage license, sold or permitted the sale of alcoholic beverages to minors on his licensed premises; whether Respondent retained alcoholic beverage invoices or sales tickets for three years in accordance with licensure requirements; and whether Respondent kept cigarette invoices or sales tickets for three years in accordance with licensure requirements.Respondent's sale of beer to minors sufficient to justify imposition of disciplinary sanctions against Respondent's license.
91-002441  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., T/A TRANS WORLD AIRLINES  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 1991
Whether surcharge taxes and excise taxes, plus penalties and interest, attributable to the sale of alcoholic beverages should be assessed against the Respondent, Trans World Airlines, Inc., d/b/a Trans World Airlines? Whether the Respondent's Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco license/permit number 78-14 should be subjected to a civil penalty or should be suspended or revoked for failure to timely file surcharge and excise tax reports and surcharge and excise taxes to the Petitioner?Surcharge and excise taxes for sale fo alcoholic beverages imposed on airline. Civil penalty for failure to file returns.
91-002331  OCEAN DRIVE HOTEL CORPORATION, D/B/A OCEAN HAVEN RESTAURANT vs DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 17, 1991
The issue is whether the application for an alcoholic beverage license should be granted or denied.Beverage license denied. Applicant's prior license revoked for drug sales at same location. Application shows insufficient management supervision on site
91-001308  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs JOSE JULIO ALVES  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 26, 1991
The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is guilty of the violation alleged in the amended notice to show cause dated November 27, 1990, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent allowed wine not purchased from a licensed vendor to be used at his licensed premises; not allowable to make gift of same to patrons.
90-002317  DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs JIMMY CARRIGAN, T/A VILLAGE DINNER  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 17, 1990
The ultimate issue for determination is whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Notice to Show Cause, issued on February 6, 1990, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Restaurant owner should be fined $1000 for failing to keep hazardous food refrigerated storing uncovered food on floor of walk-in cooler and other violations

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer