welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Roger William Sims
Roger William Sims
Roger William Sims
Visitors: 60
0
Bar #194803(FL)     License for 49 years
Orlando FL

Are you Roger William Sims? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 1.01, 120.52, 120.569, 120.57, 120.574, 120.595, 120.68, 163.3161, 163.3167, 163.3177, 163.3180, 163.3184, 163.3245, 163.3248, 187.201, 211.32, 267.061, 337.0261, 373.016, 373.019, 373.042, 373.069, 373.086, 373.1131, 373.403, 373.413, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.421, 373.430, 378.202, 378.203, 378.205, 378.207, 378.208, 378.209, 378.212, 380.06, 403.031, 403.087, 403.088, 403.201, 403.412, 57.105

Florida Administrative Code: 40D-1.102, 40D-1.602, 40D-1.604, 40D-4.031, 40D-4.091, 40D-4.201, 40D-4.301, 40D-4.302, 40D-4.331, 40D-4.351, 40D-40.031, 40D-40.112, 40D-40.331, 40D-40.351, 40D-40.381, 40D-8.041, 62-302.300, 62-302.530, 62-330.200, 62-340.300, 62-340.450, 62-340.600, 62-345.600, 62-4.242, 62C-16.0021, 62C-16.0041, 62C-16.0045, 62C-16.0051, 62C-16.0075, 62C-16.0091

16-001861  CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH vs PALM BEACH COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 01, 2016
The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Respondents, Florida Department of Transportation (“FDOT”) and Palm Beach County (also referred to as “the Applicants”), are entitled to the issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) to construct an extension of State Road 7 (“SR 7”) and its associated surface water management system in Palm Beach County.Petitioner failed to prove that the applicants were not entitled to the environmental resource permit to build the SR 7 extension and associated surface water management system.
15-004711GM  CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2015
The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Wellness Way Area Plan Map and Text Amendment to the Lake County Comprehensive Plan (“Remedial Amendment”) adopted through Lake County Ordinance No. 2016-1 is “in compliance,” as defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.
15-005278GM  CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 2015
The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Wellness Way Area Plan Map and Text Amendment to the Lake County Comprehensive Plan (“Remedial Amendment”) adopted through Lake County Ordinance No. 2016-1 is “in compliance,” as defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.
16-000628GM  CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 04, 2016
Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.
10-002988GM  CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, OLD CORKSCREW PLANTATION, LLC, OLD CORKSCREW PLANTATION V, LLC, TROYER BROTHERS FLORIDA, INC., AND FFD LAND COMPANY, INC. vs LEE COUNTY  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2010
The issues to be determined in this case are whether the amendments to the Lee County Comprehensive Plan that were adopted through Ordinance Nos. 10-19, 10-20, 10-21 and Remedial Ordinance No. 10-43 ("Plan Amendments") are "in compliance," as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2011).1/Petitioners failed to prove beyond fair debate that the plan amendments adopted by Lee County are not in compliance.
08-003886  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003887  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003888  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003889  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
03-000791  PEACE RIVER/MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer