Leon FL Lawyers | Ruth Bizzell Dillard -- eLawyers

89-001861 F AND M CONCRETE COMPANY, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 07, 1989

The issue for consideration in this case was whether Petitioner, F & M Concrete Company, Inc., should be recertified as a disadvantaged business enterprise, pursuant to Chapter 14-78, F.A.C.None of women owners of business exercise sufficient control over business operations to qualify for certification as Disadvantaged Business Enterprise. Ownership is in name only

89-000976 THREE RIVERS CONTRACTING, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 17, 1989

Whether Three River Contracting, Inc. is entitled to certification as a disadvantaged business enterprise under Rule 14-78.005, Florida Administrative Code?Mother became president of family corporation after first application for disadvantaged business enterprise certification was denied. Recommend grant.

89-001496 MCNEW MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 23, 1989

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner is entitled to certification as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise pursuant to Rule 14-78, Florida Administrative Code.Petitioner entitled to certification as Disabled Business Enterprise; Female owned 95% of stock and was Chief Executive Officer; while her husband was involved in company and had more technical background, her role was real.

89-001495 PRO GRADING vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 04, 1989

Whether or not Pro Grading, Inc., may be certified by the Department of Transportation as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, pursuant to Chapter 14-78 F.A.C.DBE applicant demonstrated "capital" or expertise in disjunctive, which was OK; effect of agency "policy" discussed; "risk" counts as to assess capital

89-001869 HILL MILLING, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 26, 1989

Whether the Respondent, Hill Milling, Inc., no longer qualifies as a disadvantaged business enterprise?Respondent no longer qualifies as a disadvantaged business enterprise. No longer a small business concern. Excessive gross receipts.

89-000938 J. A. RAYFIELD vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 30, 1989

The issue is whether Petitioner is entitled to certification as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise.No proof that applicant is socially or economically disadvantaged.

89-000939 SUN STATE LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 30, 1989

The issue is whether Petitioner is entitled to certification as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise.No minority business enterprise because controlling person, from Iran not a listed minority who benefits from presumption and offered no evidence of discrimination.

Ruth Bizzell Dillard