Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Ruth E Vafek
Ruth E Vafek
Visitors: 77
0
Bar #34220(FL)     License for 17 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Ruth E Vafek? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-2093  R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Morales  (2017)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 27, 2017
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 27, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D17-2093 Lower Tribunal No. 07-16277 _ R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Petitioner, vs. Barbara Morales, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Bronwyn Miller, Judge. King & Spalding LLP, and William L. Durham II (Atlanta, GA); Scott Michael Edson (Washington, D.C.); Carlton Fields Jorden Burt..
2D15-941  Shulstad v. Shulstad  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 25, 2016
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RAYMOND M. SHULSTAD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-941 ) MITZI A. SHULSTAD, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 25, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Ashley B. Moody, Judge. Mark A. Neumaier, Tampa, for Appellant. Bradley J. McDonald and Matthew E. Thatcher of The Solomon Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee. LaROSE, Judge. R..
SC13-838  Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc.  (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC13-838 _ ALACHUA COUNTY, et al., Petitioners, vs. EXPEDIA, INC., et al., Respondents. [June 11, 2015] PERRY, J. This case is before this Court for review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). In its decision, the district court certified the following question of great public importance: DOES THE “LOCAL OPTION TOURIST DEVELOPMENT ACT,” CODIFIED AT SECTION 125.0104, FLORIDA STAT..
4D09-2964  Marc v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2010 Citations: 46 So. 3d 1045
46 So. 3d 1045 (2010) Rony MARC, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D09-2964. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 29, 2010. Rehearing Denied November 22, 2010. Rony Marc, Perry, pro se. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene C. Hvizd, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the circuit court's denial of the appellant's motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Proce..
19-004954  ADRIAN WAGNER vs STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 17, 2019
The issues are whether Petitioner effectively elected to move her retirement account from the Florida Retirement System (“FRS”) Pension Plan to the FRS Investment Plan prior to her retirement from state employment or, if not, whether Respondent, State Board of Administration (“SBA”) is estopped from claiming that Petitioner did not successfully elect to move her retirement account into the FRS Investment Plan.The evidence failed to establish that Petitioner completed her election to move her retirement account from the Pension Plan to the Investment Plan prior to ending her employment.
20-000740  ROBERT MARINAK vs STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2020
The issues in this case are whether Petitioner was properly enrolled in the Florida Retirement System (FRS) Hybrid Option Plan (Hybrid Option) in 2002, and whether he should be retroactively re-enrolled in the Florida 1 All statutory references are to the 2019 version of the Florida Statutes, except where indicated otherwise. Retirement System Pension Plan (Pension Plan) without having to pay a “buy-in” amount.Pet. did not rebut presumption that initial election to transfer from Pension Plan to Hybrid Option was made with his full knowledge and consent. SBA has no authority to grant Pet. a second election to re-enroll in Pension Plan without paying a “buy in."
21-000001  ANGELA WILLIAMS vs STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 04, 2021
Whether Petitioner, Angela Williams (Petitioner or Ms. Williams), was properly enrolled in the Florida Retirement System (“FRS”) Investment Plan upon the expiration of her election period after she was employed by the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) in March 2019.Petitioner failed to prove that the State Board of Administration erred by enrolling her, by default, in the Florida Retirement System Investment Plan.
21-000084  LADDIE BUHOLZ vs STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 11, 2021
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioner was correctly defaulted into the Florida Retirement System (“FRS”) Investment Plan after he was hired into an FRS-eligible position on November 1, 2019.Petitioner believed he had elected the Florida Retirement System Pension Plan online, but was unable to provide any competent proof of such and was, therefore, automatically enrolled in the Investment Plan.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer