The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether a recreational vehicle with a gross vehicle weight in excess of 10,000 pounds meets the definition of "commercial motor vehicle" under relevant Florida law when driven by an employee of a licensed recreational vehicle dealer, rather than by the ultimate consumer.Petitioners showed that agency interpretation of statutory authority to effect that motor home was a "commercial vehicle" was erroneous as matter of fact and law.
The issue is whether Respondent CSX Transportation, Inc.'s railroad crossing located on Old Kings Road in Jacksonville, Florida, meets the criteria for closure as set forth in Rule 14-46.003(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code.Railroad crossing meets criteria for closure; safety benefits of crossing closure outweigh any inconvenience.
The issue is whether Respondent CSX Transportation, Inc.'s railroad crossing located on Old Kings Road in Jacksonville, Florida, meets the criteria for closure as set forth in Rule 14-46.003(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code.Railroad crossing meets criteria for closure; safety benefits of crossing closure outweigh any inconvenience.
The issue is whether Respondent CSX Transportation, Inc.'s railroad crossing located on Old Kings Road in Jacksonville, Florida, meets the criteria for closure as set forth in Rule 14-46.003(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code.Railroad crossing meets criteria for closure; safety benefits of crossing closure outweigh any inconvenience.
Petitioner protests the method by which Respondent Department of Transportation (DOT) advertised RFP-DOT-99/00-3002 and RFP-DOT-99/00-3003 and the specifications contained in the RFP's SCOPE OF SERVICES, Sections 1.7.2, 2.0-A, 14.0-A, 14.0-B, and 14.0-C.Each Request for Proposals is de novo; potential bidders cannot rely on a prior course of dealing if advertisement meets rule requirements. Redundant background checks are contrary to competition, if not contrary to statutes.
