Leon FL Administrative law and Environmental Law Lawyers

Silvia Morell Alderman

Visitors: 52

Bar #242365(FL) License for 47 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Silvia Morell Alderman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 1.04, 1013.36, 120.569, 120.57, 163.3177, 163.3184, 163.3187, 171.211, 373.083, 373.4135, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.4592, 403.412, 63.132, 90.705

Florida Administrative Code: 40E-63.011, 40E-63.091, 40E-63.101, 40E-63.130, 40E-63.143, 40E-63.145, 9J-5.001, 9J-5.003, 9J-5.005, 9J-5.015

5D08-1807 Wilson v. State (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 29, 2008 Citations: 987 So. 2d 221

987 So. 2d 221 (2008) Freddie WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D08-1807. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. July 29, 2008. *222 Freddie Wilson, Polk City, pro se. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a). PALMER, C.J., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, J.J. concur.

97-1143 RUTHERFORD, MULHALL & WARGO v. Antidormi (1997)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 25, 1997 Citations: 695 So. 2d 1300

695 So. 2d 1300 (1997) RUTHERFORD, MULHALL & WARGO, P.A., Petitioner, v. Allen ANTIDORMI, Respondent. No. 97-1143. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 25, 1997. John T. Mulhall III and Nicole Caruso Seropian of Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A., Boca Raton, pro se. Andrew K. Fein of Bloch & Minerley, P.L., Boca Raton, for respondent. *1301 PER CURIAM. The law firm of Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A. imposed a retaining lien on its office file for a former client who disput..

05-004308 KEVIN BURKETT vs OSCEOLA COUNTY, HABITAT RESTORATION, INC.; AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 23, 2005

The issues in this case are whether Petitioner has standing to initiate this proceeding and whether Respondents Osceola County and Habitat Restoration, Inc., demonstrated their entitlement to the permit modification they are requesting.Petitioner lacks standing to challenge the proposed modification of an environmental resource permit because his alleged injury is too speculative. The permit applicants provided reasonable assurances that all applicable regulatory criteria had been met.

12-002811 FLORIDA AUDUBON SOCIETY vs SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA, UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, SUGAR FARMS CO-OP, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 17, 2012

The issue to be determined in this case is whether Respondents, United States Sugar Corporation (“USSC”), Sugar Farms Co-op (“SFC”), and Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida (“SCGC”) (collectively “the Applicants”) are entitled to the Everglades Works of the District permits (“WOD Permits”), issued to them by the South Florida Water Management District (“District”).Petitioner failed to prove that the Applicants are not entitled to the Works of the District permits in the Everglades Agricultural Area.

07-005779GM JENNIFER COCHRAN vs CITY OF CRESTIVIEW (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 24, 2007

The issue is whether the City of Crestview's (City's) small-scale development amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 1370 on November 26, 2007, is in compliance. Small-scale amendment not in compliance because of internal inconsistency with the Plan, lack of intergovernment coordination, insufficient data and analysis, and incompatibility with adjoining properties.

04-003918 BOARDWALK AT APPLEYARD, LLC vs TALLAHASSEE-LEON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 29, 2004

The issue is whether Wood Partners' application for a Type B site plan (TSP040060) and deviations should be approved in light of the Joint Post-Hearing Stipulation of issues remaining for consideration.The applicant proved that the proposed site plan deviations for a 312-unit multi-family complex located north of West Tennessee Street should be approved, with conditions.

94-003734GM HILLARY SKLAR vs CITY OF COOPER CITY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 1995

Whether Petitioner has failed to allege sufficient facts to support a finding that she has standing to institute this proceeding.Petitioner failed to allege facts sufficient to prove standing. Dismissal Recommended.

89-001121 TUXEDO FRUIT COMPANY vs. FLORIDA SUN CEMENT COMPANY, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 04, 1989

The central issue in this case is whether the permit to construct a Cyclonaire Docksider pneumatic unloading system, permit no. AC 56-157174, which was requested by Florida Sun Cement Company, Inc., should be approved.Applicant entitled to premit with special conditions challenger has standing to raise issue but failed to rebut permit.

89-003309 TUXEDO FRUIT COMPANY vs. FLORIDA SUN CEMENT COMPANY, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 04, 1989

At issue is an agency decision which concluded that proposed alterations to the Florida Sun bulk cement transfer facility to be located in Ft. Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida, do not constitute "modifications" or "substantial modifications" as those terms are defined by rule.Tuxedo argues similar to DOAH case no. 89-1121. No second point of entry to restate issues previously litigated.

86-001078 SARASOTA-MANATEE AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL vs. MANATEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 15, 1986

Application for Development Approval and special permit granted. Terminal project consistent with state/local comprehensive plans.