welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Stuart Fraser Williams
Stuart Fraser Williams
Stuart Fraser Williams
Visitors: 72
0
Bar #670731(FL)     License for 22 years; Member in Good Standing
Jacksonville FL

Are you Stuart Fraser Williams? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 2 U.S.C 1396a, 29 U.S.C 1144, 42 U.S.C 1, 42 U.S.C 13, 42 U.S.C 1396, 42 U.S.C 1396a, 42 U.S.C 1396b, 42 U.S.C 1396k, 42 U.S.C 1396p

CFR: 42 CFR 40.255, 42 CFR 40.255, 42 CFR 40.255, 42 CFR 440.255

Florida Laws: 1.01, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.55, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 17.54, 210.31, 287.057, 333.14, 336.12, 373.223, 390.0112, 400.121, 408.031, 408.034, 408.035, 408.039, 408.045, 408.0455, 408.15, 408.802, 408.811, 408.813, 408.814, 408.815, 408.819, 409.901, 409.902, 409.904, 409.905, 409.906, 409.908, 409.910, 409.9101, 409.913, 409.9131, 409.919, 409.920, 409.975, 414.095, 414.39, 415.101, 429.01, 429.02, 429.14, 429.19, 429.28, 429.29, 429.34, 429.41, 559.01, 57.105, 624.155, 627.428, 627.727, 694.15, 712.09, 766.118, 766.301, 766.303, 766.316, 768.14, 768.21, 768.81, 812.014, 907.04, 910.10, 950.01, 960.065

SC12-2406  Nadia Garcon v. Florida Agency for Health Care Administration  (2014)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 06, 2014
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC12-2406 _ NADIA GARCON, et al., Petitioners, vs. FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. [November 6, 2014] PER CURIAM. We accepted jurisdiction to review the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in Garcon v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 96 So. 3d 472 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict with Smith v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 24 So. 3d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009), and Roberts v. Albertson’s, Inc., 119..
13-004113BID  CARE ACCESS PSN, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2013
The issues in this bid protest are whether, in making the decision to award Intervenor Prestige Health Choice, LLC ("Prestige"), a contract to provide Medicaid managed medical assistance services as a provider service network in Region 11 (covering Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties), Respondent Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA") acted contrary to a governing statute, rule, or solicitation specification; and, if so, whether such action was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious. (In this protest, Petitioner Care Access PSN, LLC ("Care Access"), challenges AHCA's intended award to Prestige in Region 11, and only that award. Care Access does not seek to upset any other intended awards in Region 11 or in any other Region.)The agency's intended contract award, being contrary to the statutes and project specifications, is clearly erroneous and should be rescinded.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer