Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Suzanne Smith Brownless
Suzanne Smith Brownless
Visitors: 20
0
Bar #309591(FL)     License for 44 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Suzanne Smith Brownless? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

02-003328  C. B. SUBRAHMANYAM; BECKY SUBRAHMANYAM; PREM SUBRAHMANYAM; JOY SUBRAHMANYAM; ANGELA K. MAIGE; CURTIS TURNAGE; MRS. TURNAGE; EDGAR T. BRUCE; WILLIAM M. PORTER; PEGGY ANN PORTER; AND CARNELIA NELSON vs LEON COUNTY AND CHARLES AND LINDA WIMBERLY  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 20, 2002
The issue for determination is whether Seminole Raceway, as proposed in Charles and Linda Wimberlys' Site and Development Plan and approved with conditions by the Leon County Development Review Committee (DRC), is consistent with the requirements of the 2010 Tallahassee-Leon County Comprehensive Plan (Comprehensive Plan) and is a permissible land use under applicable provisions of Chapter 10, Leon County Code (the Code).Site and Development plan for Seminole County Raceway satisfies requirement of Seminole County Comprehensive Plan and relevant provisions of the zoning code.
95-001452DRI  PARK CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL (ORDINANCE NO. 95-23) vs CITY OF POMPANO BEACH  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 1995
The central issue in this case is whether the original development order adopted by the city, Ordinance no. 82-43, created a buildout date which precludes the extension of such time until December 30, 2002, without a showing, by clear and convincing evidence, that such extension would not create a substantial deviation.Facts of this case distinguish it from precedent relied on by petitioner because buildout unambiguous in Development Order and later ordinances.
95-000749GM  HISTORIC GAINESVILLE, INC.; DUCKPOND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC.; MARK BARROW; AND JANE MYERS vs CITY OF GAINESVILLE, JOHN AND DENISE FEIBER, KATHERINE BODINE AND DEPARTMENTOF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 21, 1995
The issue in this case is whether the City of Gainesville comprehensive plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 4036 on October 24, 1994, is in compliance.Plan amendment found not to be in compliance. On remand, evidence not reweighed since proper burden of proof used in initial Recommended Order.
94-003734GM  HILLARY SKLAR vs CITY OF COOPER CITY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 1995
Whether Petitioner has failed to allege sufficient facts to support a finding that she has standing to institute this proceeding.Petitioner failed to allege facts sufficient to prove standing. Dismissal Recommended.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer