Monroe FL Commercial real estate and Residential real estate -- eLawyers

Thomas Dickinson Wright

Visitors: 41

305-743-8118

Bar #257664(FL) License for 46 years

Marathon FL

Are you Thomas Dickinson Wright? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

01-001082 DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001

Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.

99-002047GM BARBARA AND WILLIAM DUBIN AND GREATER PINE ISLAND CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC. vs LEE COUNTY (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 03, 1999

At issue in this proceeding is whether PAM 98-01, a small scale amendment to the future land-use map ("FLUM") of the Lee County Comprehensive Plan (the "Lee County Plan" or the "Plan"), changing the future land-use designation of approximately 9.9 acres of land on Pine Island from Rural to Outlying Suburban, complies with the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes.Small-scale comprehensive plan amendment was found to be in compliance with statutory and rule requirements.

95-000098GM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs LEE COUNTY (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 11, 1995

Ultimately at issue in this case is whether certain comprehensive plan amendments, adopted by Lee County Ordinance No. 94-30, are "in compliance" with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. As reflected in the Preliminary Statement, many of the subordinate issues raised by parties seeking to have the plan amendments found to be "not in compliance" have been withdrawn, and others have been stricken as not timely raised or for other reasons. The remaining issues are addressed in this Recommended Order.Amendments deleted overlay used to settle case on 89 plan, leaving plans % district's or other objectionable measures in mixed use categories and overall located number.

Thomas Dickinson Wright

01-001082 DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2001)

99-002047GM BARBARA AND WILLIAM DUBIN AND GREATER PINE ISLAND CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC. vs LEE COUNTY (1999)

95-000098GM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs LEE COUNTY (1995)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.