Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Thomas Francis Panza
Thomas Francis Panza
Visitors: 72
0
Bar #138551(FL)     License for 54 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Thomas Francis Panza? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-003820CON  THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA D/B/A JACKSON HOSPITAL WEST vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2016
The issues in these cases are whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10432 filed by East Florida-DMC, Inc. (DMC), to build an 80-bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, or CON Application No. 10433 filed by The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida d/b/a Jackson Hospital West (JW), to build a 100-bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, on balance, satisfy the applicable criteria; and, if so, whether either or both should be approved.When evaluated in the context of the applicable statutory and rule criteria, neither applicant for a new hospital in the Doral area of Dade County established need for its proposal.
17-003025RP  FLORIDA SOCIETY OF AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTERS, INC.; HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A OAK HILL HOSPITAL; HSS SYSTEMS, LLC, D/B/A PARALLON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE GROUP; AND AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2017
The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.
17-003026RP  HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A OAK HILL HOSPITAL AND HSS SYSTEMS, LLC, D/B/A PARALLON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE GROUP vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2017
The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.
17-003027RP  AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2017
The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.
16-005837RP  SHANDS JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-005838RP  FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, INC., D/B/A TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-005839RP  LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM, D/B/A LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-005840RP  BAYFRONT HMA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, D/B/A BAYFRONT HEALTH - ST. PETERSBURG vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-005841RP  ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-000115CON  EAST FLORIDA-DMC, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Whether, on balance, Certificate of Need (“CON”) application number 10395 by The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida (“JW”) to build a 100-bed acute care hospital in Miami- Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, and/or CON application number 10394 by East Florida-DMC, Inc. (“DMC”), to build an 80- bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, satisfy the applicable criteria and should be approved.The evidence supported a need for a new hospital to be located in Doral, Miami-Dade County. On balance, East Florida-DMC better satisfied the applicable criteria and should be awarded CON 10394 to construct 80-bed hospital on its site in Doral.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer