Leon FL Lawyers | Thomas L Barnhart -- eLawyers

05-000920BID TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES OF BROWARD, INC. vs COMMISSION FOR THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2005

Whether the Notice of Intent issued by the Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (Respondent) to award a contract for Medicaid Non-Emergency Transportation Services (Medicaid NET Services) to Medicaid beneficiaries in Broward County to LogistiCare Solutions, LLC (Intervenor) is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, rules, or policies; Whether the bid or proposal specifications relating to the receipt and evaluation of the Responses to the Requests for Proposals RFP-DOT-04/05-9021-LG (RFP) was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious; Whether an evaluator was improperly biased or legally unqualified to render a fair and impartial evaluation; and Whether the provisions of the RFP, Federal law, Chapters 286 and 287, Florida Statutes (2004), or agency policy were violated by the proposed award to Respondent concerning the provision of Medicaid NET Services in Broward County.A member of the evaluation committee for the Request for Proposals for transportation services in Broward County had the appearance of a conflict of interest. The evaluation of the bids was improper and clearly erroneous. Recommend a re-bid.

04-000017BID HEMOPHILIA HEALTH SERVICES vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2004

The issue in these cases is whether the Agency for Health Care Administration's (AHCA) proposed award of a contract to Caremark, Inc., based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP), is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Respondent`s failure to evaluate cost proposals according to the Request for Proposals method is clearly erroneous, arbitrary, and capricious.

04-000018BID LYNNFIELD DRUGS, INC., D/B/A HEMOPHILIA OF THE SUNSHINE STATE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2004

The issue in these cases is whether the Agency for Health Care Administration's (AHCA) proposed award of a contract to Caremark, Inc., based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP), is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Respondent`s failure to evaluate cost proposals according to the Request for Proposals method is clearly erroneous, arbitrary, and capricious.

03-002300MPI JESUS S. RODRIGUEZ, M.D. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 23, 2003

The issue for determination is whether Respondent may recover alleged overpayments of Medicaid claims that Respondent paid during the audit period from June 15, 2000, through June 14, 2002, pursuant to Sections 409.907 and 409.913, Florida Statutes (2000).Respondent should not recover overpayment based on retroactive repeal of a prior interpretation of the existing Rule and prior non-rule policy.

03-000773MPI R & R MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003

Whether Petitioner received Medicaid overpayments and, if so, the total amount of the overpayments.Evidence at hearing was sufficient to establish Agency was entitled to refund of overpayments.

95-005623BID ALAN TAYLOR vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 21, 1995

The issue in this case is whether Respondent's intent to award a lease contract to Gulf Atlantic is fraudulent, arbitrary, illegal, or dishonest.Lease contract awarded to sole responsive bidder. Winning bid rejected as non-responsive due to inadequate space and lack of Heating, Vents, and Air Conditioning certification.

95-003137BID DOUGLAS REYMORE vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 22, 1995

The issue presented is whether the Department acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally, or dishonestly in determining that the Intervenor, rather than Petitioner, should be awarded the contract for child support enforcement legal services for Martin and Okeechobee Counties.Successful protest of bid award where proposal submitted by apparent winner was non-responsive and score received from evaluation committee illogical.

Thomas L Barnhart