welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Thomas Porter Crapps
Thomas Porter Crapps
Thomas Porter Crapps
Visitors: 99
4
Bar #878928(FL)     License for 34 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Thomas Porter Crapps? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 42 U.S.C 1396u, 5 U.S.C 706

Florida Laws: 1012.01, 1012.795, 110.123, 119.071, 120.52, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 20.42, 287.001, 287.057, 409.912, 409.962, 409.966, 409.97, 409.974, 409.981, 420.504, 420.507, 420.5087, 420.5099, 815.045, 90.803

Florida Administrative Code: 67-60.009, 6B-1.006

19-000754BID  SOCIAL SENTINEL, INC. vs STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
The issue is whether Respondent's decision to reject all replies to Invitation to Negotiate 2019-44, Social Media Monitoring (ITN), is arbitrary or illegal, within the meaning of section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes.DOE's failure to meet statutory deadline for procurement of social media monitoring tool does not constitute illegality so as to require setting aside of its reject-all decision.
18-000485BID  LIBERTY SQUARE PHASE TWO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 29, 2018
The issue to be determined in this bid protest matter is whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s, intended award of funding under Request for Applications 2017- 108, entitled “SAIL Financing of Affordable Multifamily Housing Developments To Be Used In Conjunction With Tax-Exempt Bond Financing And Non-Competitive Housing Credits” was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner failed to prove that Florida Housing's intended award of funding to Intervenor was erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious. Florida Housing was authorized to waive an error as a "Minor Irregularity."
08-006357PL  DR. ERIC J. SMITH, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs WILLIE C. GREEN  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 19, 2008
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint and if so, what penalties should be imposed?Petitioner did not demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed an act of immorality or failed to protect students from conditions harmful to their safety.
99-003180  SHIRLEY W. DUNBAR AND DAVID M. DUNBAR vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 1999
The issue is whether Respondent properly issued Site Approval Order No. 3-99-01 for Ochlockonee Bay Seaplane Base pursuant to Chapter 330, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 14-60, Florida Administrative Code.Application for seaplane base site approval should be denied because the applicant has not provided a final FAA air space approval, Respondent did not consider the minimum safety standards in FAA Advisory Circular No. 150/5395-1, and site is inadequate.
99-003181  DAVID LA HART AND VAL LA HART vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 1999
The issue is whether Respondent properly issued Site Approval Order No. 3-99-01 for Ochlockonee Bay Seaplane Base pursuant to Chapter 330, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 14-60, Florida Administrative Code.Application for seaplane base site approval should be denied because the applicant has not provided a final FAA air space approval, Respondent did not consider the minimum safety standards in FAA Advisory Circular No. 150/5395-1, and site is inadequate.
99-003182  HOWARD GRINER vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 1999
The issue is whether Respondent properly issued Site Approval Order No. 3-99-01 for Ochlockonee Bay Seaplane Base pursuant to Chapter 330, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 14-60, Florida Administrative Code.Application for seaplane base site approval should be denied because the applicant has not provided a final FAA air space approval, Respondent did not consider the minimum safety standards in FAA Advisory Circular No. 150/5395-1, and site is inadequate.
20-003376BID  RA OUTDOORS, LLC, D/B/A ASPIRA vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2020
Whether Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection's ("Department") intended decision to award a contract to Intervenor, US eDirect, Inc. ("US eDirect"), for a Parks Business System ("PBS"), pursuant to Invitation to Negotiate 2019002 ("the ITN"), is contrary to the Department's governing statutes, rules, or the ITN specifications, and contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.DEP's decision to award contract to Intervenor US eDirect for a Parks Business System pursuant to the ITN is not contrary to statutes, rules, ITN specifications, contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer