welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Victor Kalman Rones
Victor Kalman Rones
Victor Kalman Rones
Visitors: 29
0
Bar #245178(FL)     License for 47 years; Member in Good Standing
North Miami Beach FL

Are you Victor Kalman Rones? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-002463  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs HARRIS M. MILLMAN, D/B/A AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 07, 2010
Does the unsatisfied civil judgment in ABC v Millman et al, Case Number 50 2008 CA 006245 XXXX MB relate to practice of Respondent’s profession, thus establishing that Respondent, Harris M. Millman, violated section 489.129(1), Florida Statutes,(2009)? If he committed the violation, what penalty should be imposed?Unsatis'd judgm't for supplies used in roofing projects and warehouse inventory related to roof'g proff. Violation of 489.129(1)(q). $500 fine & costs. Cont. ed. & requiring proof of satisf. not required for contractor who recognized & tried to pay debt.
11-001088  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF INSURANCE AGENTS AND AGENCY SERVICES vs WESTON PROFESSIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 01, 2011
Whether Weston Professional Title Group, Inc. (Respondent) committed the violations alleged in Counts I, II, III, V, VI, and VII of the Amended Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Tile agency was guilty of failing to disburse funds pursuant to HUD-1 settlement statement and failing to maintain surety. Allegations of fraud and incompetence were not proven.
01-002597PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY vs ROBERT JARKOW  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 2001
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated February 5, 1999, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed. The Respondent maintains that the instant action is barred by laches and violates Section 455.225, Florida Statutes.Delay in prosecuting case did not prejudice Respondent and does not support laches. If anything, Respondent benefited from lack of witnesses.
01-002598PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY vs ROBERT JARKOW  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 2001
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated February 5, 1999, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed. The Respondent maintains that the instant action is barred by laches and violates Section 455.225, Florida Statutes.Delay in prosecuting case did not prejudice Respondent and does not support laches. If anything, Respondent benefited from lack of witnesses.
90-001626  BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY vs ROBERT E. CARLSON  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 1990
The issue is whether Mr. Carlson is guilty of misconduct in his practice as a certified public accountant by making personal use of trust fund monies or by his firm's issuance of an audit report on a bank while one of the firm's partners was a shareholder in the bank.Accountant desciplined for personal use of trust fund and issuing audit report on bank while his partner was shareholder in bank (lack of independence)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer