welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Walter Kelly
Walter Kelly
Walter Kelly
Visitors: 58
0
Bar #181697(FL)     License for 50 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Walter Kelly? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

W-316  Ruppert v. Estate of Hastings  (1975)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 07, 1975 Citations: 311 So. 2d 810
311 So. 2d 810 (1975) Walter RUPPERT Sr., Appellant, v. In re ESTATE of Charles Francis HASTINGS, Deceased, Appellee. No. W-316. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 7, 1975. *811 Merritt H. Powell, and G. Larry Sims, Cobb, Cole, Sigerson, McCoy, Bell & Bond, Daytona Beach, for appellant. William Akers, III, and Henry P. Duffett, of Duffett, Barry, Seps, Meade & Akers, Ormond Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The facts of this appeal are not in dispute. Charles F. Hastings exec..
94-3421  John A. Thelen v. Marc's Big Boy Corp., Marcus Corp., and Stephen H. Marcus  (1995)
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: Aug. 21, 1995 Citations: 64 F.3d 264
64 F.3d 264 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1090 John A. THELEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARC'S BIG BOY CORP., Marcus Corp., and Stephen H. Marcus, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-3421. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued Feb. 21, 1995. Decided Aug. 21, 1995. Walter Kelly (argued), Milwaukee, WI, for John A. Thelen. Stanley S. Jaspan, Lawrence T. Lynch (argued), Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, WI, for Marc's Big Boy Corp., Marcus Corp., and Stephen H. Marcus. Before POSNER, Chief Judg..
94-2687  Maureen A. Warzon v. William R. Drew and Milwaukee County, and Tommy Thompson, James R. Klauser, and Darryl Enriquez, Intervenors-Appellees  (1995)
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: Jul. 19, 1995 Citations: 60 F.3d 1234
60 F.3d 1234 10 IER Cases 1444 Maureen A. WARZON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William R. DREW and Milwaukee County, Defendants-Appellees, and Tommy Thompson, James R. Klauser, and Darryl Enriquez, Intervenors-Appellees. No. 94-2687. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued Jan. 17, 1995. Decided July 19, 1995. Walter Kelly (argued), Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff-appellant. Mark A. Grady (argued) and Robert E. Andrews, Office of the Corp. Counsel, Milwaukee, WI, for defendants-appellees...
89-1381    (1990)
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: Apr. 23, 1990 Citations: 898 F.2d 533
898 F.2d 533 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 809 , 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,770, 58 USLW 2635, 59 Ed. Law Rep. 335 Katherine KING, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Stephen A. Sonstein and Franklin Stein, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees. Nos. 88-3481, 88-3482, 89-1381 and 89-1477. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued Dec. 14, 1989. Decided March 22, 1990. As Amended March 22, ..
83-2998  Lawrence Vandenplas and Barbara Vandenplas v. City of Muskego  (1985)
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: Jan. 21, 1985 Citations: 753 F.2d 555
753 F.2d 555 Lawrence VANDENPLAS and Barbara Vandenplas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MUSKEGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 83-2998. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued Nov. 9, 1984. Decided Jan. 21, 1985. Robert E. Sutton, Walter Kelly, Sutton & Kelly, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiffs-appellants. Raymond J. Pollen, Riordan, Crivello, Carlson, Mentkowski & Henderson, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendants-appellees. Before WOOD and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges, and WISDOM, Senior ..
75-1108    (1975)
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: Jun. 17, 1975 Citations: 517 F.2d 1203
517 F.2d 1203 Jane DOE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis J. CECI, Circuit Court Judge, Milwaukee County, Defendant-Appellant. Jane DOE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis J. CECI, etc., Defendant-Appellant, and Richard Flynn, M.D., etc., Proposed Intervening Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 75-1108 and 75-1109. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 20, 1975. Decided June 17, 1975. John A. Fiorenza, S. A. Schapiro, Milwaukee Wis., for defendant-appellant. Judith Mears, American ..
8-00-BK-16984-PMG  In Re Numed Home Health Care, Inc.  (2004)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 2004 Citations: 310 B.R. 226
310 B.R. 226 (2004) In re NUMED HOME HEALTH CARE, INC., Debtor. No. 8-00-BK-16984-PMG. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 30, 2004. *228 David S. Jennis, Jennis & Bowen, Richard J. Mclntyre, Tampa, FL, for Debtor. ORDER ON (1) MOTION OF HELLER HEALTHCARE FINANCE, INC. FOR DISGORGEMENT AND FOR DISTRIBUTION TO HELLER FROM ESCROW; (2) MOTION OF HELLER HEALTHCARE FNANCE, INC. FOR THE ALLOANCE OF REASONABLE FEES, COSTS, AND CHARGES PURSANT TO SECTION 506(b) OF THE BANK..
03-16984-8G7  In Re Stone  (2005)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2005 Citations: 329 B.R. 882
329 B.R. 882 (2005) In re Mitchell Scott STONE, Lillian Haydee Stone, Debtors. No. 03-16984-8G7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. July 22, 2005. Ronald R. Bidwell, Law Office of Ronald R. Bidwell PA, Tampa, FL, for Debtors. ORDER ON MOTION BY UNITED STATES TO OVERRULE CONTESTED MATTER PAUL M. GLENN, Chief Judge. THIS CASE came before the Court for hearing to consider the Motion to Overrule Contested Matter filed by the United States of America, Internal Revenue Servic..
10-006279BID  PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 2010
The issue in this case is whether the evaluators of the subject request for proposals (RFP) were qualified under the applicable law and RFP criteria to evaluate the proposals.Petitioner did not meet its burden of proving that evaluators were unqualified to evaluate responses to RFP; recommend dismissal of petition.
10-006280BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 2010
The issues are whether the intended contract awarded to Intervenor, The Henry and Rilla White Foundation, Inc. (Intervenor or White), pursuant to Request for Proposals #P2062 (RFP) for an Intensive Delinquency Diversion Services (IDDS) program in Palm Beach County, Florida (Circuit 15), is contrary to Respondent’s governing statutes, policies and rules, and the RFP. Petitioner, Juvenile Services Program, Inc. (Petitioner or JSP), timely challenged the intended award, and alleged that the award to Intervenor was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.BID protester failed to establish Department incorrectly scored or abitrarily awarded bid at issue. Department's decision is supported by the record.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer