Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
William Barton Meacham
William Barton Meacham
Visitors: 28
0
Bar #43000(FL)     License for 29 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you William Barton Meacham? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-004464  CHRISTOPHER B. SCOTT vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 23, 2018
The issue is whether Petitioner, Christopher B. Scott, as the managing member of PNC, LLC (PNC), is personally liable for a penalty equal to twice the total amount of the sales and use tax owed by PNC to the State of Florida.1/Petitioner, as managing member of a company/taxpayer, was personally liable for a penalty, based on twice the total amount of sales and use tax owed the State for the audit period.
18-005005  VMOB, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 19, 2018
Whether factual and legal grounds support the Department of Revenue’s jeopardy findings and assessment, dated May 26, 2017.DOR proved jeopardy finding was appropriate and taxpayer failed to satisfy tax obligations when it failed to file electronically and checks used for tax payment were dishonored by bank.
17-003452  DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE vs VMOB, LLC, D/B/A CHEAP ON HOWARD  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 2017
The issues are as follows: 1) Whether grounds exist to revoke the Certificate of Registration to collect taxes held by VMOB, LLC, d/b/a Cheap on Howard; 2) Whether factual and legal grounds support the Department of Revenue’s jeopardy findings and assessments for October 2016, November 2016, December 2016, and February 2017; and 3) Whether factual and legal grounds support the Department of Revenue’s assessment of personal liability against VMOB’s managing member, Verna Bartlett.Department of Revenue proved that VMOB, LLC's Certifcate of Registration to collect sales and use tax should be revoked, that certain taxes collected are or were in jeopardy, and that Verna Bartlett is personally liable.
17-003630  VMOB, LLC, D/B/A CHEAP ON HOWARD vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 22, 2017
The issues are as follows: 1) Whether grounds exist to revoke the Certificate of Registration to collect taxes held by VMOB, LLC, d/b/a Cheap on Howard; 2) Whether factual and legal grounds support the Department of Revenue’s jeopardy findings and assessments for October 2016, November 2016, December 2016, and February 2017; and 3) Whether factual and legal grounds support the Department of Revenue’s assessment of personal liability against VMOB’s managing member, Verna Bartlett.Department of Revenue proved that VMOB, LLC's Certifcate of Registration to collect sales and use tax should be revoked, that certain taxes collected are or were in jeopardy, and that Verna Bartlett is personally liable.
14-004647  DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE vs TAMPA HYDE PARK CAFE, LLC  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2014
The issue is whether Respondent's Certificate of Registration 39-8011930243-9 should be revoked for the reasons stated in an Administrative Complaint for Revocation of Certificate of Registration (Administrative Complaint) issued by the Department of Revenue (Department) on June 5, 2014.Dealer failed to comply with the terms of a compliance agreement; revocation of certificate of registration recommended.
14-002538  DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE vs PNC LLC, D/B/A CHEAP  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 29, 2014
Whether the Department of Revenue (Department or Petitioner) may revoke the certificate of registration issued to Respondent for failure to comply with the terms of a compliance agreement.Petitioner proved that Respondent breached the compliance agreement. Revocation of Respondent's certificate of registration is not warranted because Respondent satisfied its past-due tax obligation.
13-002152BID  TAMCO ELECTRIC, INC. vs PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 2013
Whether Respondent's action to reject all bids submitted in response to ITB 13-803-205, relating to the removal and replacement of the public address system at Countryside High School, is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, as alleged in the Amended Petition.Petitioner failed to prove that the decision by the Pinellas County School Board to reject all bids was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulant.
13-002153BID  TAMCO ELECTRIC, INC. vs PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 2013
Whether Respondent's action to reject all bids submitted in response to ITB 13-803-206, relating to the removal and replacement of the public address system at Pinellas Park High School, is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, as alleged in the Amended Petition.Petitioner failed to prove that the decision by the Pinellas County School Board to reject all bids was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer