Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
William Edward Hahn
William Edward Hahn
Visitors: 32
1

Free initial consultation

Bar #147108(FL)     License for 52 years
Winter Park FL

Are you William Edward Hahn? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

08-001140N  DOUGLAS STALLEY, AS GUARDIAN OF THE PROPERTY OF INAAYA LIMONE vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 2008
At issue is whether Inaaya Limone, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).The infant`s brain injury likely post-dated "resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period." Therefore, the claim was not compensable.
00-003823N  SANDRA NAP BRITT AND FRANK BRITT, ON BEHALF OF AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF DAVID BRITT vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 2000
At issue is whether David Britt, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan. If so, whether the notice requirements of the Plan were satisfied.Petitioners` motion to amend final order and/or for rehearing denied because Petitioners acknowledged newly discovered evidence would not alter the conclusion that the infant had suffered a birth-related neurological injury.
91-003997F  ERIC GROSCH vs BOARD OF MEDICINE  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 27, 1991
Whether the Respondent was substantially justified in bringing the charges contained in the Amended Administrative Complaint heard November 6, 1990, in DOAH Case No. 90-4808.Petitioner was substantially justified in bringing charges aginst respondent.
90-004808  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ERIC GROSCH  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 03, 1990
The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is guilty of the violations alleged in the amended administrative complaint dated October 19, 1990; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Department failed to prove by clear and convincing standard violations against respondent medical records within standard actions also within standard.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer