Filed: Aug. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15169 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15169 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00031-MCR-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARQUISE DEMETRIS JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 9, 2013) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15169
Summary: Case: 12-15169 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15169 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00031-MCR-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARQUISE DEMETRIS JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 9, 2013) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15169 ..
More
Case: 12-15169 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15169
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00031-MCR-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARQUISE DEMETRIS JENKINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(August 9, 2013)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-15169 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Michelle Hendrix, appointed counsel for Marquise Jenkins in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jenkins’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2