Filed: Aug. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-13572 Date Filed: 08/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13572 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20896-JAL-6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SYLVESTER FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 16, 2013) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Reginald Moss, appoin
Summary: Case: 11-13572 Date Filed: 08/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13572 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20896-JAL-6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SYLVESTER FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 16, 2013) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Reginald Moss, appoint..
More
Case: 11-13572 Date Filed: 08/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-13572
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20896-JAL-6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SYLVESTER FISHER,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(August 16, 2013)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Moss, appointed counsel for Sylvester Fisher in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
Case: 11-13572 Date Filed: 08/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fisher’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2