Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Elizabeth Cantu, 12-15813 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15813 Visitors: 132
Filed: Sep. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15813 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15813 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:98-cr-00028-RS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIZABETH CANTU, a.k.a. Lisa Cantu, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 5, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15813 D
More
            Case: 12-15813   Date Filed: 09/05/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 12-15813
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 5:98-cr-00028-RS-3



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

ELIZABETH CANTU,
a.k.a. Lisa Cantu,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                             (September 5, 2013)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 12-15813     Date Filed: 09/05/2013   Page: 2 of 2


      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Elizabeth Cantu in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cantu’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer