Filed: Sep. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15813 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15813 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:98-cr-00028-RS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIZABETH CANTU, a.k.a. Lisa Cantu, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 5, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15813 D
Summary: Case: 12-15813 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15813 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:98-cr-00028-RS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIZABETH CANTU, a.k.a. Lisa Cantu, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 5, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15813 Da..
More
Case: 12-15813 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15813
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:98-cr-00028-RS-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELIZABETH CANTU,
a.k.a. Lisa Cantu,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(September 5, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-15813 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Elizabeth Cantu in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cantu’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2