Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Arthur Smith, 12-15584 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15584 Visitors: 79
Filed: Sep. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15584 Date Filed: 09/25/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15584 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20673-DLG-23 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTHUR SMITH, a.k.a Co-Chief, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 25, 2013) Before DUBINA, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15584 Date F
More
            Case: 12-15584    Date Filed: 09/25/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]


             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

                         ________________________

                               No. 12-15584
                           Non-Argument Calendar
                         ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20673-DLG-23


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus


ARTHUR SMITH,
a.k.a Co-Chief,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                        __________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Florida
                        _________________________

                             (September 25, 2013)

Before DUBINA, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 12-15584    Date Filed: 09/25/2013   Page: 2 of 2


      Philip R. Horowitz, counsel for Arthur Smith in this direct criminal appeal,

has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer