Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Mark Joseph Harvey, 19-11123 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-11123 Visitors: 86
Filed: Aug. 16, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 16, 2010 No. 09-14389 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 09-80023-CR-KAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK JOSEPH HARVEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 16, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard L.
More
                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]


             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                   FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________   ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                           AUGUST 16, 2010
                              No. 09-14389                   JOHN LEY
                          Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                        ________________________

                    D. C. Docket No. 09-80023-CR-KAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

MARK JOSEPH HARVEY,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Florida
                       _________________________

                              (August 16, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Mark Joseph Harvey in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harvey’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.1




       1
          Our affirmance of Harvey’s convictions and sentences shall not inhibit the district
court’s plenary consideration of any Sixth Amendment claims that may be raised by 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 motion to vacate, based on counsel’s representation in the district court.

                                               2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer