Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Grant, 10-11277 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-11277 Visitors: 114
Filed: Oct. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-11277 OCT 20, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cr-00368-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL ANTHONY GRANT, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (October 20, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Steven
More
                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT           FILED
                         ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                             ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                No. 10-11277                    OCT 20, 2010
                            Non-Argument Calendar                JOHN LEY
                          ________________________                 CLERK

                  D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cr-00368-WTM-GRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

      versus

MICHAEL ANTHONY GRANT,
                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                          Southern District of Georgia
                         _________________________

                                (October 20, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Steven L. Beauvais, appointed counsel for Michael Anthony Grant in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Grant’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer