Filed: Oct. 27, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11231 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 27, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00068-MSS-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CALVIN N. POPE, JR., llllllllllllllllllll l Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 27, 2010) Before BARKETT, PRYOR
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11231 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 27, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00068-MSS-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CALVIN N. POPE, JR., llllllllllllllllllll l Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 27, 2010) Before BARKETT, PRYOR ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11231 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 27, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00068-MSS-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CALVIN N. POPE, JR.,
llllllllllllllllllll l Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 27, 2010)
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Calvin N. Pope, Jr., has filed a motion to
withdraw from further representation on appeal, supported by a brief prepared
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pope’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2