Filed: Feb. 22, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14562 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEB 22, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:01-cr-00038-HES-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OTIS MCRAY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 22, 2011) Before BLACK, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Maurice C. Grant, I
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14562 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEB 22, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:01-cr-00038-HES-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OTIS MCRAY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 22, 2011) Before BLACK, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Maurice C. Grant, II..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14562 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEB 22, 2011
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 3:01-cr-00038-HES-TEM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OTIS MCRAY,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(February 22, 2011)
Before BLACK, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed counsel for Otis McRay in this 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) proceeding, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McRay’s sentence is
AFFIRMED.
2