Filed: Mar. 18, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 18, 2011 No. 10-13264 JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 4:09-cv-00101-HLM C.C., LISA COLEMAN, As Natural Parent and Legal Guardian for C.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus BARTOW COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (March 18, 2011) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 18, 2011 No. 10-13264 JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 4:09-cv-00101-HLM C.C., LISA COLEMAN, As Natural Parent and Legal Guardian for C.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus BARTOW COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (March 18, 2011) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and W..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 18, 2011
No. 10-13264
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 4:09-cv-00101-HLM
C.C.,
LISA COLEMAN,
As Natural Parent and Legal Guardian for C.C.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
BARTOW COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(March 18, 2011)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants/Plaintiffs C.C. and his mother Lisa Coleman appeal the district
court’s grant of summary judgment for Appellee/Defendant Bartow County School
District on their Title IX claims of sexual discrimination. The Plaintiffs contend
that they have put on sufficient evidence to create genuine issues of material fact
for all elements of their Title IX claim.
After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the
benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district court correctly held that the
Plaintiffs failed to create a genuine issue of material fact whether C.C. suffered
discrimination “so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively
bar[red his] access to an educational opportunity or benefit.” Davis Next Friend
LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Bd. Of Educ.,
526 U.S. 629, 650
119 S. Ct. 1661,
1675 (1999). Therefore, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment
in favor of the Defendants.
AFFIRMED.
2