Filed: Apr. 14, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15492 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar APRIL 14, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00055-ACC-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALONZIA MARQUES CONTRELL PHILLIPS, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of F
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15492 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar APRIL 14, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00055-ACC-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALONZIA MARQUES CONTRELL PHILLIPS, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Fl..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15492 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar APRIL 14, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00055-ACC-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALONZIA MARQUES CONTRELL PHILLIPS,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 14, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Alonzia Contrell Phillips in this
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Phillips’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2