Filed: Aug. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUG 3, 2011 No. 10-14648 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No.0:09-cr-60042-JIC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CINDY MORAN-SANCHEZ, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 3, 2011) Before CARNES, WILSON and BLACK,
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUG 3, 2011 No. 10-14648 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No.0:09-cr-60042-JIC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CINDY MORAN-SANCHEZ, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 3, 2011) Before CARNES, WILSON and BLACK, ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
U.S.
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUG 3, 2011
No. 10-14648 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No.0:09-cr-60042-JIC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CINDY MORAN-SANCHEZ,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(August 3, 2011)
Before CARNES, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed as Cindy Moran-Sanchez’s counsel for
purposes of her appeal, filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief prepared
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moran-Sanchez’s conviction and sentence
is AFFIRMED.
2