Filed: Oct. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-11227 Date Filed: 10/30/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11227 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:12-cr-80175-DTKH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSMANI FERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Osmanis Fernandez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 30, 2013) Before MARTIN, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-11
Summary: Case: 13-11227 Date Filed: 10/30/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11227 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:12-cr-80175-DTKH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSMANI FERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Osmanis Fernandez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 30, 2013) Before MARTIN, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-112..
More
Case: 13-11227 Date Filed: 10/30/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-11227
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:12-cr-80175-DTKH-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OSMANI FERNANDEZ,
a.k.a. Osmanis Fernandez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(October 30, 2013)
Before MARTIN, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-11227 Date Filed: 10/30/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Randee J. Golder, appointed counsel for Osmani Fernandez in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fernandez’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2