Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Cecil DeWitt Nelson, 13-11316 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-11316 Visitors: 33
Filed: Dec. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-11316 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11316 _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00005-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CECIL DEWITT NELSON, a.k.a. Red, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (December 2, 2013) Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: David M. Burns, Jr., appointed counsel
More
              Case: 13-11316   Date Filed: 12/02/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]


               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                                No. 13-11316
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00005-BAE-GRS-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

CECIL DEWITT NELSON,
a.k.a. Red,


                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Georgia
                        ________________________
                             (December 2, 2013)

Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      David M. Burns, Jr., appointed counsel for Cecil Dewitt Nelson, has filed a

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
              Case: 13-11316     Date Filed: 12/02/2013   Page: 2 of 2


California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer