Filed: Dec. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10296 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10296 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-00051-JES-SPC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTOINE WITTER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 6, 2013) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counse
Summary: Case: 13-10296 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10296 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-00051-JES-SPC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTOINE WITTER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 6, 2013) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel..
More
Case: 13-10296 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10296
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-00051-JES-SPC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTOINE WITTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(December 6, 2013)
Before MARCUS, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Antoine Witter in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
Case: 13-10296 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 2 of 2
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Witter’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2